Search Results for "Rural Development"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rural Development"

1340 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1340 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Resort Developer Against Prohibition of Construction in Backwater Island. CRZ Notification 1991 Applies to Backwater Islands; No Development Zone Restrictions Upheld.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Kapico Kerala Resorts Pvt. Ltd. challenging a Kerala High Court order that prohibited resort construction on Ne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch Under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Lack of Proper Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that removal without affording opportunity of hearing and without proper enquiry is unsustainable.

24 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Shri Jagdish Mannalalji Sancheriya, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Anji (Mothi), District Wardha in March 2019 fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for Versova Mangroves — No Violation of CRZ Norms Found. Court held that the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors and did not violate the CRZ Notification, 2011.

4 Dec 2020

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by 14 petitioners, including residents of Versova, Mumbai, and the Jai Bharat Cooperative Housing Soc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Conflict of Interest Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 — Respondent Used Official Position to Obtain NOC for Spouse's Business, Violating Section 10(1)(h).

3 May 2011

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Verla Canca village, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2004-05. Mere Change of Opinion Cannot Justify Reopening When All Material Facts Were Disclosed During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

31 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960 and the Bombay Public Trust Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Member for Having More Than Two Children Under Section 14(1)(j1) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Children from Both Marriages Counted Regardless of Divorce; Belated Application Does Not Bar Disqualification.

5 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Ashok Balasaheb Chaugule, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat of Tardal, Taluka Hatkanangale, District Kolhapur in 2007. Res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

14 Dec 2012

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Displaced Person. Acquisition under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for rehabilitation of respondent no. 4 upheld as valid and not vitiated by malafides.

5 Mar 2014

The petitioners, claiming to be shareholders of the Communidade of Betalbatim (respondent no. 3), filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Panchayat Samiti Member's Nomination to Market Committee Over Chairman's Claim — Rule 40A of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Cannot Override Section 13(1)(d) of the Act. The court held that the Panchayat Samiti's resolution electing a member as its representative under Section 13(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is valid and cannot be overridden by Rule 40A of the Rules.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajeshri Arun Munghate, a member of the Panchayat Samiti, Gadchiroli, challenged an order of the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperativ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company Challenging Property Tax Demand by Gram Panchayat on Land Within MIDC Area. Gram Panchayat Cannot Levy Tax on Land Already Subject to MIDC Levy Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

13 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing two and three wheelers, has its registered ...

87 88 89 90 91

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)