Search Results for "Seized Money"

1718 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1718 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Grant of Bail and Inadequate Material to Establish 'Habitual' Bootlegger

The petitioner, Kashinath Motiram Chavan, challenged a detention order dated 23 March 2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Syed Imam and Durgadas Kaushalye, a Police Sub Inspector and Police Head Constable, respect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty Based on Child Witness Testimony — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Husband Who Strangled Wife on Suspicion of Infidelity

The appellant, Balasaheb Digambar Mane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of his wife Kavera under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jagadish Anant Narvekar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai for the murder of his aunt Sarita under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows FERA Appeal: Tribunal Erred in Affirming Penalty for Alleged Contravention of Section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973 — Remittances Protected Under Remittances in Foreign Exchange (Immunities and Exemptions) Act, 1991 and Scheme of 1991.

The appellants, four individuals, received US$ 25,000 each in their savings bank accounts with Bank of Baroda on or about 12 October 1991, totaling US...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Perjury Against Trap Panch Witness for Giving Contradictory Testimony in Corruption Case. Witness's Inconsistent Statements in Chief and Cross-Examination Amounted to Perjury Under Section 193 IPC.

The appellant, Manikrao Shivram Wagh, was a trap panch witness in a corruption case (Special Case No.4/1999) against Samadhan Bhusari, who was tried f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Compensation and Declaration of Sale Agreement as Void. Amendment Sought to Challenge Agreement for Sale of Property Allegedly Purchased with Siphoned Funds Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The Plaintiff, Edit II Productions, filed a suit seeking compensation for financial loss caused by the Defendants who allegedly siphoned funds from th...