Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Extortion Allegations Against Police — No Grounds Made Out for CBI/CID Probe or Departmental Enquiry. The Court held that the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of illegal arrest and extortion by police officers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 16
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sanjeev Bishnudev Mishra, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction for transfer of investigation of C.R. No.I-22/2012 registered at Navghar Police Station, Bhayander, Thane to an independent agency like CBI or CID. He also prayed for a departmental enquiry against Respondent Nos.4 and 5 (police officers) for alleged illegal arrest and extortion of Rs.11,25,000/- on 9.2.2012. The petitioner contended that the police had registered a false FIR and illegally detained him, extorting money. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and police officers, opposed the petition, stating that the investigation was ongoing and the allegations were baseless. The High Court, after hearing arguments, held that the petitioner failed to make out a case for transfer of investigation or departmental enquiry. The court noted that the investigation was in progress and no mala fides or irregularities were established. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Transfer of Investigation - The petitioner sought transfer of investigation of FIR to CBI/CID alleging illegal arrest and extortion by police officers. The Court held that no ground was made out for such transfer as the investigation was already in progress and the allegations were not substantiated. (Paras 1-35)

B) Criminal Procedure - Investigation - FIR Registration - The petitioner challenged the registration of FIR and alleged illegal detention and extortion of Rs.11,25,000/- by police. The Court found that the investigation was being conducted properly and no interference was warranted. (Paras 1-35)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner has made out a case for transfer of investigation to CBI/CID or for departmental enquiry against police officers based on allegations of illegal arrest and extortion.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that no case was made out for transfer of investigation or departmental enquiry.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Transfer of investigation to CBI/CID
  • Scope of judicial review in police investigation
  • Allegations of illegal arrest and extortion by police
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012:BHC-AS:24779-DB

Writ Petition No.1681 of 2012

2012-10-31

A.M. Khanwilkar, R.Y. Ganoo

2012:BHC-AS:24779-DB

Mr.Subhash Jha i/b Law Global for the Petitioner, Ms.P.H. Kantharia (A.P.P.) for Respondent Nos.1 to 5, Ms.Seema Rawde for Respondent No.6

Sanjeev Bishnudev Mishra

State of Maharashtra, The Director General of Police, The Superintendent of Police (Thane Rural), Shri Dinkar Pinigle, Shri Ranjeet Andhale, The Municipal Commissioner (MCGM), The Branch Manager (ICICI Bank Mulund West), The Branch Manager (ICICI Bank Mulund West)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking transfer of investigation and departmental enquiry against police officers.

Remedy Sought

Direction to appoint CBI/CID to investigate FIR, direction for departmental enquiry against police officers, and return of alleged extorted amount of Rs.11,25,000/-.

Filing Reason

Allegations of illegal arrest, detention, and extortion by police officers in connection with C.R. No.I-22/2012.

Issues

Whether the petitioner has made out a case for transfer of investigation to CBI/CID? Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction for departmental enquiry against police officers?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the police registered a false FIR, illegally arrested him, and extorted Rs.11,25,000/-. Respondents contended that the investigation was ongoing and the allegations were baseless.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of illegal arrest and extortion, and the investigation was proceeding properly, hence no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

By this Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays for a direction that an investigating agency like Central Bureau of Investigation or CID be appointed to properly investigate the C.R. No.I-22/2012 registered with Navghar Police Station, Bhayander, District Thane.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.1681 of 2012 before the Bombay High Court. The judgment was reserved on 12.9.2012 and delivered on 31.10.2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Extortion Allegations Against Police — No Grounds Made Out for CBI/CID Probe or Departmental Enquiry. The Court held that the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Authorities to Decide Pending CRZ Clearance Application for SRA Project Within Four Weeks. Delay in Decision on Coastal Regulation Zone Clearance Cannot Be Justified by Pendency of New Coastal Zone Management Plan.