Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1721 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1721 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Against Karnataka State Law University and Others on LLB Admission Eligibility. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Admission Notifications and Endorsements Requiring 10+2+3 Study Pattern for Three-Year LLB Course.

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the elig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act and Rule 8(4) of MCR Rules, 2016. Petition Seeks Execution of Mining Lease Deed and Challenges Orders of Union and State Governments.

The petitioner, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (originally ABG Cement Ltd., later Vadraj Cement Ltd.), filed a writ petition befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Property by Co-operative Bank Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Auction Sale Confirmed Despite Alleged Irregularities as Petitioner Failed to Prove Fraud or Collusion.

The petitioner, M/s. Priyesh Land Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging the auction sale of its property by the respondent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Case — Redemption Fine and Penalty Reduced for Import of Used Personal Effects. Gold chain with diamond pendant held to be 'personal effects' under Baggage Rules, 1998, entitling duty-free import.

The petitioner, a US citizen of Indian origin, arrived in Mumbai on 6th May 2007 from New York. He was wearing a gold chain with a pendant embedded wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.

The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...