High Court of Karnataka Considers Service and Promotion Related Writ Petitions Filed by Several District Judges. The Petitions Challenge Certain Decisions of the Department of Law and Administrative Reforms Concerning Judicial Officers' Seniority and Promotion.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 168
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010289472013_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (09) 12

W.P.NOS.41684-41691/2012 (S-PRO) c/w W.P.NO.28147/2013 (S-RES)

2013-09-27

Dilip B Bhosale

Basavaprabhu S Patil, Sr. Adv. for Brijesh Patil for petitioners; P S Rajagopal, Sr. Adv. along with Raghavendra G Gayathri, AGA for R1-3; Puttige R Ramesh for Sachin V.R. for R5, 32, 33, 42, 47 and 50; Sharath S Gowda for R8 & 35; K.V. Narasimhan for R6, 9, 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 23, 31, 48

N Rudrmuni, Shivashankar B Amarannavar, R J Sathish Singh, Smt Uma, V Srishananda, Hanchate Sanjeev Kumar, Smt S Mahalaxmi N Nerale, Master R K G M M Mahaswamiji

Multiple respondents (80) including Department of Law, Justice & Human Rights, Government of Karnataka; Department of Public & Administrative Reforms; The Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions concerning service and promotion matters of judicial officers

Procedural History

Cause title amended as per court order dated 2013-04-03

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Election Petition on Technical Grounds Due to Absence of Mandatory Affidavit for Corrupt Practice Allegations. The High Court had allowed dismissal application under Section 86(1) of Representation of People Act, 1951, finding...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Land Tribunal Order Confirming Occupancy Rights Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act. Landlord's Claim of Tenancy Not Established as Tenant Was in Possession Prior to 1974 Cut-off Date.