Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Service and Promotion Related Writ Petitions Filed by Several District Judges. The Petitions Challenge Certain Decisions of the Department of Law and Administrative Reforms Concerning Judicial Officers' Seniority and Promotion.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
Admin
2026-08-02 16:06:16
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010289472013_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (09) 12

W.P.NOS.41684-41691/2012 (S-PRO) c/w W.P.NO.28147/2013 (S-RES)

2013-09-27

Dilip B Bhosale

Basavaprabhu S Patil, Sr. Adv. for Brijesh Patil for petitioners; P S Rajagopal, Sr. Adv. along with Raghavendra G Gayathri, AGA for R1-3; Puttige R Ramesh for Sachin V.R. for R5, 32, 33, 42, 47 and 50; Sharath S Gowda for R8 & 35; K.V. Narasimhan for R6, 9, 12, 14, 15, 19, 21, 23, 31, 48

N Rudrmuni, Shivashankar B Amarannavar, R J Sathish Singh, Smt Uma, V Srishananda, Hanchate Sanjeev Kumar, Smt S Mahalaxmi N Nerale, Master R K G M M Mahaswamiji

Multiple respondents (80) including Department of Law, Justice & Human Rights, Government of Karnataka; Department of Public & Administrative Reforms; The Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions concerning service and promotion matters of judicial officers

Procedural History

Cause title amended as per court order dated 2013-04-03

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Considers Service and Promotion Related Writ Petitions Filed by Several District Judges. The Petitions Challenge Certain Decisions of the Department of Law and Administrative Reforms Concerning Judicial Officers' Seniority and... 2026-08-02 16:06:16
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Apportionment of Liability Between Joint Tortfeasors Based on Degree of Negligence. The court held that where two vehicles are involved in a collision, liability must be apportion... 2026-08-02 16:06:13
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition acquittal natural justice murder compensation Burden of Proof benefit of doubt limitation Article 226 circumstantial evidence
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Championship L...

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Ch...

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court Decrees in Malankara Church Disputes. Rival...

Supreme Court Directs State Governments to Implement National Food Security Act, 2013 Mand...

Lost Your Password?