Search Results for "civil dispute versus criminal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "civil dispute versus criminal"

2410 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2410 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Extended Relatives in Dowry Harassment Case. Vague and Omnibus Allegations Without Specific Role Under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC Do Not Justify Trial for Relatives Residing Separately.

17 Mar 2021

The judgment arose from a criminal application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bombay High Court at Auranga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Civil Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Amendment Sought to Include Plea of Dispossession Before Suit and Subsequent Acquittal in Criminal Case. Court Held That Amendment Does Not Change Nature of Suit and Is Necessary for Effective Adjudication, Rejecting Trial Court's View That It Introduces New Case.

27 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Vikas s/o Prem Somkuwar, filed a civil suit against the respondents, Kailas s/o Panjabrao Dunedar and Bhadant Nagarjun Surai Sasai, on...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Retired Forest Officer in Encroachment Case — Lack of Independent Application of Mind and Inordinate Delay. Criminal prosecution initiated mechanically on court direction without independent application of mind and after inordinate delay of over 10 years from retirement is an abuse of process of law under Section 482 CrPC.

26 Sep 2018

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur quashed criminal proceedings against Laxmanrao Shende, a retired Forest Range Officer, in a public interest litigation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of Forgery and Cheating in Revenue Records Held to Be Essentially Civil Disputes Not Attracting Criminal Penalties Under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 IPC.

4 Dec 2020

The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, by its judgment dated 4 December 2020, allowed Criminal Application No. 547 of 2012 filed by Paraji Sheshrao Mada...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Fraud Dispute. Serious Allegations of Misappropriation Render Dispute Non-Arbitrable Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Jan 2011

The Applicant, Ivory Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ap...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Attempt to Murder in Family Property Dispute — No Prima Facie Case Under Section 307 IPC. Allegations of poisoning and assault found to be exaggerated and unsupported by medical evidence, leading to quashing of criminal proceedings.

29 Jul 2010

The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 158/20...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Employee for Absence During COVID-19 Pandemic: Section 188 IPC and Disaster Management Act Offences Not Made Out as Order Was Not Promulgated by Public Servant. The court held that an order communicated via WhatsApp and telephonic instructions does not constitute a 'duly promulgated' order under Section 188 IPC, and the order to report to duty was not an order under the Disaster Management Act, 2005.

17 Mar 2026

The present application was filed by Fazal Mohammad Jusabji Khatri, a Deputy Executive Engineer, seeking quashing of FIR No. C. R. 1121101520051 of 20...

78 79 80 81 82

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)