Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Fraud Dispute. Serious Allegations of Misappropriation Render Dispute Non-Arbitrable Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Applicant, Ivory Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 2 January 1995 with the Respondent, Nusli Neville Wadia. The agreement required the Applicant to develop property and pay the Respondent 12% of sale proceeds. Disputes arose, and the Respondent filed a civil suit on 4 February 2008 alleging fraud, misappropriation, and that the Applicant transferred properties to related entities instead of genuine third parties, seeking declarations, injunctions, and damages of Rs. 350.99 crores. The Applicant contended that the disputes were covered by the arbitration clause. The court held that where serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation are made, the dispute is not arbitrable and must be adjudicated by a civil court. The application was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Appointment of Arbitrator - Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Existence of Arbitration Agreement - The court must examine the existence of an arbitration agreement and whether the dispute is arbitrable. Where serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation are made, the dispute may not be capable of resolution by arbitration. (Paras 1-4)

B) Arbitration Law - Non-Arbitrable Disputes - Fraud - Serious Allegations - Where the Respondent alleges that the Applicant committed fraud by transferring properties to related entities and not paying the agreed share, such disputes involving fraud and misappropriation are not arbitrable and must be decided by a civil court. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the disputes between the parties are arbitrable in view of the serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation raised by the Respondent, and whether an arbitrator should be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is dismissed.

Law Points

  • Arbitration agreement
  • existence of
  • Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • fraud
  • serious allegations
  • non-arbitrable
  • court's jurisdiction
  • prima facie existence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (01) 49

ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.123 OF 2008

2011-01-07

DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

Mr.I.M.Chagla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Tushad Cooper, Ms.Hemlata Jain, Mr.Amey Nabar, Ms.Sukhada Wagle i/b.M/s.Hariani & Co. for the Applicant; Mr.Navroz Seevai, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Venkatesh Dhond, Mr.Rohan Kelkar, Mr.Shrikant Doijode, Mr.Parag Kabadi and Ms.Falguni Thakkar i/b.Doijode Associates for the Respondent.

Ivory Properties & Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

Nusli Neville Wadia

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 2 January 1995.

Filing Reason

Disputes arose between the parties regarding the development of property and payment of 12% share; the Respondent filed a civil suit alleging fraud and misappropriation.

Issues

Whether the disputes are arbitrable given the serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant argued that the disputes are covered by the arbitration clause and an arbitrator should be appointed. Respondent contended that the allegations of fraud and misappropriation render the dispute non-arbitrable.

Ratio Decidendi

Disputes involving serious allegations of fraud and misappropriation are not arbitrable and must be decided by a civil court.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The case of the Respondent in the suit is that the Applicant could develop segments of the land by constructing buildings thereon and that the constructed areas could be transferred only to genuine third parties against the payment of a 12% share to the Respondent.

Procedural History

The Applicant filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on an unspecified date. The Respondent had previously filed a civil suit on 4 February 2008 and a criminal complaint. The court heard the application and dismissed it on 7 January 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 11(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Fraud Dispute. Serious Allegations of Misappropriation Render Dispute Non-Arbitrable Under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Civil Revision Application in Arbitration Matter — Section 34 Application Maintainable Only Before Court Having Jurisdiction Over Arbitration. Territorial jurisdiction for setting aside an arbitral award un...