Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2022 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2022 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications for Tourism Project — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as No Personal Right or Public Interest Established.

The petitioner, Arjun Mahadev Harmalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Civil Revision Application Against Land Acquisition Officer's Refusal to Refer Enhancement Compensation Claim. Case Raises Issue Whether Officer Can Reject Reference Under Section 34(1) of Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 When Agreement for Negotiated Price Exists.

The case arose from the acquisition of land Gut No. 26, admeasuring 2 H. 10 R, situated at Village Ladgaon, Aurangabad, belonging to the original owne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010306832010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Award in Land Acquisition Appeal Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Addressed Claims for Severance and Injurious Affection, Upholding Valuation Principles and Evidentiary Standards for Loss Determination.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land by the Government of Maharashtra for the BHIMA (Ujjani) Irrigation Project, which affected a trolley li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapse. Petitioners contend that acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Sections 24, 25 of the 2013 Act due to non-making of award within prescribed period.

These writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging land acquisition proceedings. The petitioners, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition in 1960s Case — Section 6 Declaration Issued Within One Year of Section 4 Notification, No Lapse Occurred.

The petitioners, owners of lands in Borla and Deonar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...