Search Results for "central electricity regulatory commission"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses DISCOM's Appeal in Solar PPA Force Majeure Dispute — Restrictive Appellate Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Electricity Act, 2003 Affirmed. Government Delays in Approvals Constitute Force Majeure; No Tariff Reduction or Liquidated Damages When Developer Not at Fault.

The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals by Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Electricity Regulatory Dispute Over Tariff Determination. Appellate Tribunal and Regulatory Commission Orders Upheld as Power Purchase Agreements Were Properly Interpreted Under Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 and Statutory Guidelines.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 30th June 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Power Generator Against Termination of PPA — Holds That Failure to Secure Fuel Supply Agreement Does Not Justify Termination Where PPA Does Not Condition Power Supply on Specific Coal Source

The case involves a dispute between M/s Adani Power (Mundra) Ltd. (appellant) and Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission and others (respondents), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to MMRDA in Metro Fare Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act. Court restrains Mumbai Metro One from revising fares higher than government-notified rates pending arbitration.

The Bombay High Court was hearing an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the Mumbai Metropoli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Food Safety Authority’s Advisories Allegedly Amending Regulations Without Statutory Power. Validity of Advisory Issued Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Questioned as Ultra Vires Section 92 of the Act.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Vital Nutraceuticals Private Limited and the Indian Drug Manufacturers’ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Against MSEDCL Over Tariff Categorization of LPG Bottling Plant as Industrial Activity. LPG Bottling Plant Held to Be Manufacturing Activity Entitling Petitioner to HT I Industrial Tariff Under MERC Tariff Order.

The Petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, challenged the categorization of its LPG Gas Bottling Plant at Sangli under the HT II Co...