High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's Notification on Appeal Filing Procedure. The court held that the notification prescribing a specific format for appeals under the Electricity Act, 2003 is not ultra vires and is within the Tribunal's rule-making power.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 22
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Limited, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a notification dated 24.02.2012 issued by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (respondent No.2). The notification prescribed a specific format for filing appeals before the Tribunal. The petitioner contended that the notification was ultra vires the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, as it imposed additional requirements not contemplated by the Act. The respondents, including the Union of India, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, and private parties (M/s Narayanpur Power Company Ltd., JSW Steel Limited, and M/s JSW Energy Limited), opposed the petitions. The court, after hearing arguments, held that the notification was within the rule-making power of the Tribunal under Section 179 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court reasoned that the power to make rules includes the power to prescribe forms and procedures for the efficient functioning of the Tribunal. The notification was found to be procedural in nature and not inconsistent with any provision of the Act. Consequently, the court dismissed both writ petitions, upholding the validity of the notification.

Headnote

A) Electricity Law - Appellate Tribunal for Electricity - Rule-making power - Notification prescribing appeal format - The petitioner challenged the notification dated 24.02.2012 issued by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity as ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003. The court held that the notification is within the rule-making power of the Tribunal under Section 179 of the Act and is not ultra vires. (Paras 1-5)

B) Electricity Law - Ultra Vires - Subordinate legislation - The court examined whether the notification prescribing a format for appeals exceeded the powers conferred by the Act. Held that the notification is procedural and does not contravene any provision of the Act. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the notification dated 24.02.2012 issued by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity prescribing a specific format for filing appeals is ultra vires the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. The notification dated 24.02.2012 is held to be valid and within the rule-making power of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of rule-making power under Section 179 of the Electricity Act
  • 2003
  • Validity of procedural notification prescribing appeal format
  • Ultra vires challenge to subordinate legislation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (06) 9

W.P.No.27999/2014 c/w W.P.No.28217/2013 (GM-KEB)

2014-06-30

Ram Mohan Reddy

Sri S.Sriranga (for petitioner), Smt.Prema Hatti (CGSC for R-1), Sri P.S.Dinesh Kumar (CGSC for R-2), Sri T.S.Amar Kumar (Adv. for R-3), Sri Sridhar Prabhu (Adv. for R-4 in W.P.27999/2014)

Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company Limited

Union of India, Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, M/s Narayanpur Power Company Ltd., JSW Steel Limited, M/s JSW Energy Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging the validity of a notification issued by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity prescribing a format for filing appeals.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the notification dated 24.02.2012 as ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

Filing Reason

The petitioner contended that the notification imposing a specific format for appeals was beyond the powers of the Tribunal under the Act.

Issues

Whether the notification dated 24.02.2012 issued by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity is ultra vires the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notification prescribing a format for appeals is ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003. Respondents argued that the notification is within the rule-making power of the Tribunal under Section 179 of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The power to make rules under Section 179 of the Electricity Act, 2003 includes the power to prescribe forms and procedures for filing appeals. A notification prescribing a specific format for appeals is procedural and not ultra vires the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The notification dated 24.02.2012 issued by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity prescribing a specific format for filing appeals is within the rule-making power of the Tribunal under Section 179 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The notification is procedural in nature and does not contravene any provision of the Act.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the notification dated 24.02.2012 issued by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity. The petitions were heard together and dismissed by the High Court of Karnataka on 30.06.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Electricity Act, 2003: Section 179
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's Notification on Appeal Filing Procedure. The court held that the notification prescribing a specific format for appeals under the Electricity Act, 2003 ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Challenging Impleadment Order in Specific Performance Suit — Purchaser Pendente Lite Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Binds Transferee to Decree, Making Impleadment Unn...