Search Results for "Western Coalfields"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Western Coalfields"

175 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Communication Denying Benefit Under Section 47 of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employee Acquiring 30% Disability During Service Held Entitled to Same Pay Scale and Service Benefits Irrespective of Section 2(t) Threshold of 40% Disability.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, an employee of Western Coalfields Ltd., suffered a disability while in service. He approached the employer seeking benefits under Sect...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Central Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

High Court

KAHC010306832010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions in Land Acquisition Act Cases — Remands for Fresh Determination of Market Value as on Section 4(1) Notification Date.

24 Nov 2022

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Wangaon, Taluka Soygaon, District Aurangabad, filed writ petitions challenging the compensation awarde...

High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

KAHC010364002010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Company in Tender Dispute — Integrity Pact Provisions Not Attracted as Tender Was Cancelled, Not Individual Disqualification. The court held that a ban from future tenders under the Integrity Pact requires satisfaction of all conditions, including proof of cartelisation or restriction of competitiveness, which was absent when the tender itself was cancelled.

6 Feb 2014

The petitioners, Techno Precision Engineers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Ram Sharan Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examined Challenge to Short Bid Submission Timeline in Tender for Pumped Storage Project. The Court considered whether a 21-day period for submitting bids in a complex infrastructure project violated Article 14 of the Constitution and whether such tender conditions are subject to judicial review.

25 Apr 2024

The writ appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition that challenged a condition in a tender floated by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Caste Scrutiny Committee's Power to Invalidate Tribe Certificates Based on Vigilance Cell Reports — Affirms Requirement of Affinity Test for Scheduled Tribe Claims. The court held that the burden of proof lies on the claimant to establish tribe status and that the committee's decision is subject to limited judicial review.

18 Mar 2015

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging the decisions of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Comm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)