Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Show Cause Notices Issued Under Repealed Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1979. Petition Challenges Recovery of Alleged DPEA Liabilities Arising Under Paragraph 7(2) of DPCO 1979 Post-Repeal, Alleging Violation of Articles 14, 265, and 300A.

The writ petition was filed by Indian Drugs Manufacturers Association and Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, acting on behalf of their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Port Authority's Decision to Remove Employee on Disproportionate Penalty Grounds. The Court examines whether the disciplinary authority violated principles of natural justice and statutory procedure under MPE Regulations, 1964.

The petitioner, a Hindi Translator with the Mormugao Port Trust, faced disciplinary action culminating in his removal from service on 30.4.2011. He wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Supplier Against Western Coalfields Limited for Withholding Admitted Dues. Withholding of Payment Based on Vigilance Report Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sujyoti India (P) Limited, a private limited company and authorized distributor of SKF India Limited, entered into a rate contract wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against U.P. Jal Nigam in Workmen Reinstatement Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court Held That the Order Dated 07.09.2015 Only Required Giving Preference to Retrenched Workmen for Future Vacancies, Not Automatic Reinstatement.

The present contempt petitions arose from an order dated 07.09.2015 passed by the Supreme Court disposing of a batch of Special Leave Petitions filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030058312022_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender for Pumping Machinery at MIDC Water Treatment Plant. Court holds that disqualification based on alleged non-submission of required documents was arbitrary and contrary to tender conditions.

The petitioner, M/s Yogiraj Powertech Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender process issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tilaknagar's Injunction Claim in Trademark Passing Off Dispute Over MANSION HOUSE and SAVOY CLUB. Court Holds That 1987 Agreements Ceding Trademarks Were Conditional and Revocable, and Tilaknagar Failed to Establish Exclusive Ownership.

The judgment arises from a commercial IPR suit involving a counterclaim by Tilaknagar Industries Ltd. (Tilaknagar) against Herman Jansen Beverages Ned...