Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

KAHC030058312022_1

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI
Admin
2026-08-24 01:54:05
  • 86
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

KAHC030058312022_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (KAR) (06) 1

W.A. No.200147 of 2022

2024-06-25

H.T. Narendra Prasad, K. V. Aravind

S.S. Naganand, Sudarshan M., P. Vilaskumar, Nitesh Padiyal

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited & Others

Andanswamy

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Service regularization dispute between electricity supply company and workers

Remedy Sought

Appellants (employer) seek to set aside single judge orders directing regularization of services; employees seek regularization from date of original appointment

Filing Reason

Challenging single judge orders in writ petitions regarding regularization of services

Previous Decisions

Single Judge orders in various writ petitions, including order dated 27.06.2022 in W.P.No.200099/2018, directing regularization of services (as per employer's appeal prayer to set aside)

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed by individuals seeking regularization of services in electricity supply companies. Learned Single Judge passed orders in 2018 and 2021/2022 directing regularization. These writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging those orders.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
service regularization writ appeal power transmission electricity supply meter reader Karnataka High Court Act

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case Over Liquor Labels — No Substantial Similarity Found Between 'Prince Santra' and Defendant's Label. The court held that the labels were not substantially similar and that the plaintiffs... 2026-09-20 20:15:46
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Petitioner's SLP Against Non-Inclusion of Section 307 IPC in Attempted Murder Case. Supreme Court Holds That Nature of Injury Is Not Sole Determinant for Section 307 IPC and Belated Charge Alteration Application Without Allega... 2026-09-20 20:15:43
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 land acquisition benefit of doubt
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 11 Arbitration Application for Appointment of Arbitrato...

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Central Excise Refund Interest Dispute Under Section ...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Income Tax Dispute — Jurisdiction under Section 263 U...

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. The prosecut...

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute Due to Lack of Consent. App...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders Allowing Writ Petitions by Lessees in Land Encr...

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Setting Aside Anganwadi Supervisor Appointment for ...

Lost Your Password?