Search Results for "Telecom Sector"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. Rabo India Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, challenged a notice dated 28.3.2011 issued under Section 148 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging E-Auction Result for Gold Mining Licence Due to Lack of Evidence of Technical Glitch. Petitioner failed to prove portal malfunction prevented bid submission; declaration of preferred bidder upheld.

The petitioner, Kundan Gold Mines Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 12.12.2025 issued by the Director General, Directorate of Geology and Min...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Minutes of Meeting Converted Force Majeure Clause into Assured Return Mechanism, Interpreting Clauses 3.4.19 and 3.7.2 of Construction Agreement. Appeal Challenges Arbitral Interpretation That State Must Compensate for Any Toll Collection Drop Exceeding 20%.

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a dispute concerning a build-operate-transfer (BOT) contract for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Withholding of Payment Due to Complaints by Ex-Employee. Unilateral Withholding of Payment Without Contractual Authority or Opportunity of Hearing Violates Article 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Mahimtura Consultants Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in consultancy engineering and project management, was awarded a contract by the Pi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Share Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. MOU for Sale of Shares Held Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment of the trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...