Search Results for "Statutory Deadline"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Allegations of Arbitrator Bias in Stamp Duty Compliance Matter. Arbitrator's Visit to Stamp Authorities to Explain Legal Process Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 Deemed Part of Statutory Duty and Not Evidence of Partiality.

The petition invoked Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking substitution of the sole arbitrator on the ground that she l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes Public Interest Litigation with Directions to Enforce Tribal Land Transfer Restrictions. Section 36A of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, Prohibition 'or otherwise' Encompasses Development Agreements and Powers of Attorney to Prevent Alienation of Tribal Land.

Background: The petitioner, a registered tribal welfare organization, filed this Public Interest Litigation raising concern over illegal transfers of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Between State of Maharashtra and Developer. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Failure of Respondent to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Appointment Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator to reso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Decides Challenge to Arbitral Award in Reclamation Work Contract Dispute. Petition Filed Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Seeking to Set Aside Award for Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order in Land Tenancy Dispute. MRT's Reversal of Collector's Order Set Aside for Ignoring Binding Supreme Court Order and Limitation Under Section 33B of Bombay Tenancy Act.

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated November 30, 2023. The MRT had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Application to Modify Final Judgment in Bhama Askhed Project Land Acquisition Case. No Ground Made Out for Extension of Time for Issuance of Notice Under Section 16(2)(a) of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Affected Persons Act, 1999.

The State of Maharashtra filed a Civil Application seeking modification of a final judgment dated 17 July 2012 passed by a Division Bench of the Bomba...