Search Results for "Section 133 Indian Contract Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 133 Indian Contract Act"

392 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Arbitrator in Shareholder Dispute Over Share Transfer and Lock-In Period — Holds That Disputes Relating to Shareholders Agreement Are Arbitrable Despite Alleged Termination of Service Agreement. The court found that the arbitration clause in the Shareholders Agreement survived termination and that the claims regarding shareholding rights fell within its scope, rejecting the respondents' objections.

18 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmukh, a Non-Resident Indian with expertise in the drilling fluid industry, filed two petitions under Section 11(...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Guarantors in SFC Act Recovery Proceedings — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Under Section 31(1)(aa) of State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Application Under Section 31(1)(aa) is Maintainable Against Guarantors Without Separate Suit and Not Barred by Limitation.

26 Feb 2019

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 19th September 2007 passed by the learned Adhoc District Judge, Pune, in Miscellaneous Civil Petition No.859 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral to Arbitration in Shipping Agency Dispute — Agency Agreement Arbitration Clause Enforceable Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that disputes regarding termination and novation of agency agreement are covered by arbitration clause and must be referred to arbitration in Tokyo.

28 Jan 2014

The judgment concerns two interconnected proceedings: Arbitration Petition No. 446 of 2003 filed by Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd. (petitioner) under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award for Jurisdictional Excess and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrator Entertained Claims Beyond Scope of Reference and Relied on Unproved Certificates, Rendering Award Patently Illegal.

20 Oct 2016

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arose from a construction dispute between Country Club (India) Ltd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition - ONGC Challenges Umpire’s Award Granting Six Days’ Extension in Pipeline Project. Petition contends that the extension was granted in breach of contract clauses 5.9 and 41.8 and without evidence, after rejecting the related claim for cost of repairs.

12 Aug 2014

The dispute arose from a contract dated 6 November 1989 between Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) as employer and a consortium of foreign...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of partnership deed and findings on dissolution, holding that reappreciation of evidence is not permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Yogendra N. Thakkar, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Referral to Arbitration Despite Fraud Allegations in Development Agreement Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Challenge When Fraud Relates to Inducement Not Affecting Contractual Terms.

19 Aug 2020

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (appellant) against Regency Mahavir Properties and others (respondents) seekin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

14 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

High Court

KAHC010306832010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)