Search Results for "Railways"

563 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 563 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Sets Aside Tribunal's Dismissal for Non-Prosecution. Held that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim application for default without considering the merits, and the matter must be restored for fresh adjudication.

The appellant, Mohd. Saber s/o Mohd. Illyas, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation for inju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger. The Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on ground of lack of proof of bonafide passenger status despite availability of a valid ticket.

The appellants, being the wife, son, and married daughter of the deceased Thippareddy, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Railway Property Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge. Possession of railway property without proof of knowledge or reason to believe it is railway property does not attract Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Bhagwat Rajaram Patil, was the owner of a rolling mill at Manyarkheda, Jalgaon. On 18 July 1999, the Railway Protection Force (RPF) co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parents' Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Holds That 'Accidental Falling' Includes Falling Due to Dizziness or Fits, Not Only Bumping Against Objects. Tribunal Erred in Narrow Interpretation of 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Arvind Sanas, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Workman in Railway Termination Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld. Continuous Service Requirement Under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Satisfied Despite Intermittent Breaks.

The appellant, Shri Jairaj N. Shetty, was employed as a Casual Cook in the Catering Section of the Commercial Department, Central Railway, Mumbai V.T....