Search Results for "Modified Award"

2957 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2957 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.

The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Canal Construction Contract — Upholds Arbitrator's Award on Premium Rate at 93.12% for Extra Work, Remits Claim No.8 for Reconsideration, and Restores Interest at 12% Per Annum

The dispute arose from a contract dated 05.02.1985 between Chandigarh Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. (claimant) and the State of Punjab (opposite party) f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Second Appeal in Land Acquisition, Enhances Compensation to Rs.3,00,000/- Per Acre Based on 10% Escalation. Interest Under Section 34 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable Only From Date of Award, Following Supreme Court Precedent in Karigowda.

The case arose from the acquisition of agricultural lands in Mugabasava village, Bailhongal taluk, Belgaum District, for the Malaprabha Reservoir Proj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against Remission of Arbitral Award for De Novo Consideration Due to Jurisdictional Error. Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Claims Not Raised Before Chief Engineer and Commissioner Under Contractual Pre-Arbitration Procedure.

The appellant, Biwater Penstocks Ltd., a UK-based company, entered into a contract with the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (first respondent)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...