Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Workman in Labour Dispute, Holding Labour Court Became Functus Officio After 30 Days from Publication of Award. Application to Set Aside Exparte Award Filed Beyond 30 Days from Publication Under Section 17A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Rule 26 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 is Not Maintainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 106
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Anantrao Kulkarni, was engaged as a skilled labourer from 01/04/1985 and was terminated orally on 20/09/1996. The Kalelkar Award was applicable to the respondent establishment. An industrial dispute was raised, and after conciliation failed, the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Aurangabad, referred the dispute to the Labour Court, Solapur, on 20/09/1996. The petitioner filed his statement of claim on 26/06/1997. The Labour Court passed an exparte award on 10/08/2000, directing reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages from 15/12/1995. The award was published on 23/11/2000. The respondent claimed to have received the award on 14/12/2000. On 14/12/2000, the respondent filed Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.3/2001 seeking to set aside the exparte award, claiming it was delivered after more than 120 days from publication. On 11/08/2004, the Labour Court allowed the application and set aside the award. The petitioner, whose mother had passed away on 09/08/2004, filed Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.23/2006 on 28/09/2006 seeking recall of the order dated 11/08/2004. The Labour Court rejected the application for condonation of delay on 25/05/2009. The petitioner filed WP No.6362/2009, which was allowed on 10/06/2010, quashing the order refusing condonation. On 14/05/2012, the Labour Court allowed the petitioner's application and restored the original award. The respondents challenged this order in the present writ petition. The legal issue was whether the Labour Court had jurisdiction to entertain the application to set aside the exparte award after 30 days from its publication. The court held that under Section 17A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read with Rule 26 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957, the Labour Court becomes functus officio after 30 days from the publication of the award. Since the award was published on 23/11/2000, the application filed on 14/12/2000 was beyond 30 days, and the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to entertain it. Consequently, the order dated 11/08/2004 setting aside the award was without jurisdiction and a nullity. The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the order dated 11/08/2004, and restored the original award dated 10/08/2000.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Functus Officio - Labour Court becomes functus officio after 30 days from publication of award under Section 17A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read with Rule 26 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - The court held that once an award is published, the Labour Court has no jurisdiction to entertain any application to set aside or recall the award after 30 days from the date of publication, as it becomes functus officio. (Paras 2, 5-6)

B) Labour Law - Exparte Award - Setting Aside - Application to set aside exparte award must be filed within 30 days from publication of award under Rule 26 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - The court held that the application filed by the respondent on 14/12/2000 was beyond 30 days from publication on 23/11/2000, and thus the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to entertain it. (Paras 5-6)

C) Labour Law - Delay Condonation - Labour Court cannot condone delay in filing application to set aside award after it becomes functus officio - The court held that once the Labour Court becomes functus officio, it cannot entertain any application for condonation of delay or set aside the award. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

When does the Labour Court/Tribunal become functus officio under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The order dated 11/08/2004 passed by the Labour Court, Solapur in Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.3/2001 is quashed and set aside. The original award dated 10/08/2000 passed in Ref. (IDA) No.90/1996 stands restored. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

Law Points

  • Labour Court becomes functus officio after 30 days from publication of award
  • Application to set aside exparte award must be filed within 30 days from publication
  • Rule 26 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules
  • 1957
  • Section 17A of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (07) 20

WRIT PETITION NO.11605 OF 2014

2015-07-01

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

Mr.P.R.Patil for petitioner, Mrs.Y.M.Kshirsagar, AGP for respondents

Dnyaneshwar S/o Anantrao Kulkarni

The Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Division, Osmanabad; The Executive Engineer, Public Works Division, Osmanabad; The Deputy Engineer, Public Works Division, Osmanabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Labour Court setting aside an exparte award and the subsequent restoration of the award.

Remedy Sought

The respondents sought to set aside the order dated 14/05/2012 allowing the petitioner's application to recall the order dated 11/08/2004 and restore the original award.

Filing Reason

The respondents filed Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.3/2001 to set aside the exparte award dated 10/08/2000, which was allowed on 11/08/2004. The petitioner later sought recall of that order, which was allowed on 14/05/2012, restoring the original award. The respondents challenged the restoration order.

Previous Decisions

The Labour Court passed an exparte award on 10/08/2000, published on 23/11/2000. The respondents filed Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.3/2001 on 14/12/2000 to set aside the award, which was allowed on 11/08/2004. The petitioner filed Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.23/2006 on 28/09/2006 to recall the order of 11/08/2004. The Labour Court rejected the condonation of delay on 25/05/2009, but this was quashed by the High Court in WP No.6362/2009 on 10/06/2010. On 14/05/2012, the Labour Court allowed the petitioner's application and restored the original award.

Issues

Whether the Labour Court had jurisdiction to entertain the application to set aside the exparte award after 30 days from its publication? When does the Labour Court become functus officio under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the Labour Court became functus officio after 30 days from the publication of the award, and thus the application to set aside the award filed on 14/12/2000 was beyond the period of 30 days from publication on 23/11/2000, making the order dated 11/08/2004 without jurisdiction. The respondents argued that the application was filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the award (14/12/2000) and thus was maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 17A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read with Rule 26 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957, the Labour Court becomes functus officio after 30 days from the publication of the award. Any application to set aside or recall the award must be filed within 30 days from the date of publication, not from the date of receipt. Once the period of 30 days expires, the Labour Court has no jurisdiction to entertain any such application.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue raised before me is as to when would the Labour Court/Tribunal be rendered 'FUNCTUS OFFICIO' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957. Under Section 17A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 read with Rule 26 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957, the Labour Court becomes functus officio after 30 days from the publication of the award.

Procedural History

The petitioner was terminated on 20/09/1996. Dispute referred to Labour Court on 20/09/1996. Exparte award on 10/08/2000, published on 23/11/2000. Respondent filed Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.3/2001 on 14/12/2000 to set aside award. Labour Court allowed it on 11/08/2004. Petitioner filed Misc. Appl. (IDA) No.23/2006 on 28/09/2006 to recall order of 11/08/2004. Labour Court rejected condonation on 25/05/2009. High Court in WP No.6362/2009 quashed that order on 10/06/2010. Labour Court allowed petitioner's application on 14/05/2012, restoring original award. Respondents filed present writ petition challenging order dated 14/05/2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 17A
  • Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957: Rule 26
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Workman in Labour Dispute, Holding Labour Court Became Functus Officio After 30 Days from Publication of Award. Application to Set Aside Exparte Award Filed Beyond 30 Days from Publication Under Section 17A o...
Related Judgement
High Court Acquiring Body Barred from Seeking Reference under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The Bombay High Court ruled that acquiring bodies cannot seek references under Section 28-A(3), as the legislative intent was to benefit landowners, not t...