Search Results for "Mamlatdar Court's Act"

323 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeal in Canal Collapse Damage Case — Negligence of Irrigation Department Established Despite Financial Constraints. Panchnama prepared by Talati-cum-Mantri held admissible as evidence under Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The present Second Appeal was filed by the original plaintiff, Patel Govindbhai Vasharambhai, under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute — Trial Court Erred in Not Framing Tenancy Issue Despite Pleadings. The Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 being a welfare legislation, no contract can waive a tenant's rights, and courts must consider its provisions.

The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court at Goa arising from a dispute between the appellants (original defendants) and the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sub-Divisional Officer's Revision Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906. Sub-Divisional Officer Not Authorized to Exercise Revisional Powers Under Section 23(2) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bija Maroti Hatwar, filed an application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, seeking to restrain respondent no.1 from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Mundkar Status Determination — Flour Mill Not Part of Dwelling House Under Goa Mundkar Act. Concurrent findings of fact by Deputy Collector and Administrative Tribunal upheld as not perverse.

The petitioner, Shri Naguesh V. Bodke, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Deputy Collector dated 15.12.2005 and the Administrative Tr...