Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Bija Maroti Hatwar, filed an application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, seeking to restrain respondent no.1 from obstructing his way to his field. The Mamlatdar allowed the application on 23 September 2002, directing removal of fencing. Respondent no.1 challenged this order in revision before the Sub-Divisional Officer under Section 23 of the Act. The Sub-Divisional Officer allowed the revision on 7 July 2003, setting aside the Mamlatdar's order. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed the present writ petition. The petitioner argued that the Sub-Divisional Officer lacked jurisdiction to entertain the revision because Section 23(2) vests revisional powers only in the Collector, and Section 23(2A) allows delegation only to an Assistant Collector, Deputy Collector, or Assistant Commissioner. The court examined the provisions and found that the Sub-Divisional Officer is not among the officers to whom the Collector can delegate revisional powers. Therefore, the Sub-Divisional Officer's order was without jurisdiction. The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Sub-Divisional Officer's order, and restored the Mamlatdar's order.
Headnote
A) Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 - Revisional Jurisdiction - Section 23(2) and Section 23(2A) - Sub-Divisional Officer's Authority - The issue was whether the Sub-Divisional Officer could exercise revisional powers under Section 23 of the Act. The court held that under Section 23(2), only the Collector has revisional powers, and under Section 23(2A), delegation can only be to an Assistant Collector, Deputy Collector, or Assistant Commissioner. The Sub-Divisional Officer is not among these officers, hence lacks jurisdiction. (Paras 4-6)
Issue of Consideration
Whether the Sub-Divisional Officer has jurisdiction to entertain and decide a revision application under Section 23 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.
Final Decision
Writ petition allowed. The order dated 7 July 2003 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer is set aside. The order dated 23 September 2002 passed by the Mamlatdar is restored.
Law Points
- Jurisdiction of Sub-Divisional Officer to entertain revision under Section 23 of Mamlatdars' Courts Act
- 1906
- Delegation of Collector's powers under Section 23(2A) of the Act
Case Details
2014 LawText (BOM) (07) 140
Writ Petition No.4510/2003
Shri N.A. Vyawahare for petitioner, Shri N.S. Rao, AGP for respondent no.2
Kisan s/o Chirkut Padole, The SubDivisional Officer, Umred
Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more)
Subscribe Now
Nature of Litigation
Writ petition challenging the order of Sub-Divisional Officer in revision under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.
Remedy Sought
Petitioner sought to quash the order of Sub-Divisional Officer and restore the Mamlatdar's order.
Filing Reason
Petitioner's application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act was allowed by Mamlatdar, but the Sub-Divisional Officer set aside that order in revision, allegedly without jurisdiction.
Previous Decisions
Mamlatdar allowed petitioner's application on 23 September 2002; Sub-Divisional Officer allowed revision and set aside Mamlatdar's order on 7 July 2003.
Issues
Whether the Sub-Divisional Officer has jurisdiction to entertain and decide a revision under Section 23 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906.
Submissions/Arguments
Petitioner argued that under Section 23(2) of the Act, only the Collector has revisional powers, and under Section 23(2A), delegation can only be to Assistant Collector, Deputy Collector, or Assistant Commissioner, not to Sub-Divisional Officer.
Ratio Decidendi
The Sub-Divisional Officer is not among the officers to whom the Collector can delegate revisional powers under Section 23(2A) of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906. Therefore, the Sub-Divisional Officer lacked jurisdiction to entertain and decide the revision application.
Judgment Excerpts
Section 23(2) of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 provides for the revisional powers and lays down that the Collector shall have the powers to revise the orders passed by the Mamlatdar.
Section 23(2A) of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906 provides delegation of the powers of Collector and the delegation can be to Assistant Collector, Deputy Collector or Assistant Commissioner subordinate to the Collector.
Procedural History
Petitioner filed application under Section 5 of Mamlatdars' Courts Act before Mamlatdar, who allowed it on 23 September 2002. Respondent no.1 filed revision under Section 23 before Sub-Divisional Officer, who allowed it on 7 July 2003. Petitioner then filed writ petition in High Court.
Acts & Sections
- Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906: 5, 23, 23(2), 23(2A)
