Search Results for "Maharashtra Judicial Service Pension Rules"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Employees' Challenge to Maharashtra Jeewan Pradhikaran Promotion Decisions -- Petitioners Fail to Prove Arbitrariness in Departmental Promotion Committee's Seniority-Based Promotions

Multiple writ petitions were filed by employees of Maharashtra Jeewan Pradhikaran challenging promotion decisions made by the Departmental Promotion C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition in Service Law Dispute Over Group Classification. The court upheld the MAT's declaration that Group 'C' employees are immune from the Revenue Division Allotment Rules, 2015, which apply only to Group 'A' and 'B' posts.

The case involves a challenge by the Director of Accounts and Treasuries (M.S.), Mumbai and others (petitioners) against a judgment of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Assistant Teacher Seeking Retirement at 60 Years Under Government Resolution. Government Resolution dated 27th October 1994 Raising Retirement Age to 60 Years Does Not Apply to Zilla Parishad Employees as They Are Not Government Servants.

The petitioner, Shaligram Laxman Wakate, was an Assistant Teacher in a Zilla Parishad School in Warodi, Akola. He was born on 17th July 1938 and appoi...