Search Results for "Coercive Recovery"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 read with Section 34, 120B, and 364 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, with life imprisonment and concurrent sentences, as evidence formed a complete chain excluding innocence.

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence of two appellants for offences under the Indian Penal Code,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Out of Defence for Non-Payment of Interim Maintenance in DV Act Case. Failure to Pay Maintenance Justifies Coercive Measure Under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Girish Vijaysingh Pardeshi, challenged an order dated 31/03/2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 7, J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Unconditional Stay of Tax Demand for Statutory Authority in Income Tax Exemption Case — Strong Prima Facie Case Based on Consistent Appellate History. Section 220(6) of Income Tax Act, 1961 invoked to stay demand of Rs.961.92 Crores pending appeal before CIT(A).

The Petitioner, Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), a statutory authority established under the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Devel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Stay of Demand for Slum Rehabilitation Authority in Income Tax Exemption Case — Prima Facie Case Established for Section 11 Exemption Despite Section 2(15) Proviso. Statutory Authority's Non-Profit Slum Rehabilitation Activities Held Charitable, Not Commercial.

The Petitioner, Slum Rehabilitation Authority, a statutory body established under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices and Assessment Order Against Charitable Trust for Amended Objects Clause. Primarily for Catholics Does Not Vitiate Charitable Purpose Under Section 2(15) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Society of the Franciscan (Hospitaller) Sisters, is a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, conducting edu...