Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Challenging Property Tax Levy by Gram Panchayat. Held that property tax is leviable on industrial land within Gram Panchayat limits under Section 124 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, and the revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd., a company manufacturing automobiles, challenged the property tax demands issued by the Gram Panchayat, Kumbephal, for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2008-09. The petitioner's factory is located in the MIDC area, Shendra, which falls within the limits of Gram Panchayat Kumbephal. The Gram Panchayat issued demand bills for property tax, which the petitioner disputed on the ground that the land is not within the Gram Panchayat limits and that the tax is not leviable on industrial land in MIDC area. The petitioner filed appeals before the Block Development Officer (first appeal) and the Standing Committee of Zilla Parishad (second appeal), both of which were dismissed. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a revision application before the Minister of Rural Development under Section 124(6) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, which was also dismissed. The petitioner then filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The court examined the provisions of the Act and found that the Gram Panchayat has the power to levy property tax on lands and buildings within its limits under Section 124(1). The court noted that the petitioner's land is situated within the Gram Panchayat limits and there is no exemption for industrial units in MIDC area. The court also held that the revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable because the order of the Block Development Officer was passed under Section 124(1) and not under Section 124(6). The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the tax demand and the orders of the lower authorities.

Headnote

A) Bombay Village Panchayats Act - Property Tax - Levy on Industrial Land - Section 124 - The Gram Panchayat is empowered to levy property tax on lands and buildings within its limits, including industrial land in MIDC area. The petitioner's contention that the land is not within the Gram Panchayat limits was rejected as the land is situated within the Gram Panchayat of Kumbephal. (Paras 1-10)

B) Bombay Village Panchayats Act - Revision - Maintainability - Section 124(6) - The revision application filed by the petitioner under Section 124(6) was not maintainable because the order of the Block Development Officer was passed under Section 124(1) and not under Section 124(6). The Minister's order dismissing the revision was upheld. (Paras 11-15)

C) Property Tax - Exemption - Industrial Units - No exemption from property tax is available to industrial units merely because they are located in MIDC area. The Gram Panchayat has the authority to levy property tax on all properties within its jurisdiction. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the property tax levied by the Gram Panchayat on the petitioner's industrial land is valid and whether the revision application under Section 124(6) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 was maintainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. The order of the Minister dated 16.4.2010 and the tax demand notices are upheld.

Law Points

  • Property tax is leviable on industrial land within Gram Panchayat limits
  • Revision under Section 124(6) not maintainable against order under Section 124(1)
  • No exemption from property tax for industrial units in MIDC area
  • Gram Panchayat has jurisdiction to levy property tax on lands within its limits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (01) 18

Writ Petition No. 4513 of 2010

2011-01-31

A.A. Sayed

Mr. R. N. Dhorde with Mr. N.R. Bhavar, Advocate for petitioner; Mr. K.B. Choudhari, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 11; Mr. V.D. Sapkal with Mr. D.R. Kale, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5; Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate for Respondent No. 6; Mr. U.B. Bondar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 7 to 10

M/s. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the Minister of Rural Development dismissing the revision application against property tax demand.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the order dated 16.4.2010 passed by the Minister and the tax demand notices.

Filing Reason

Petitioner disputed the property tax levied by Gram Panchayat Kumbephal on its industrial land in MIDC area.

Previous Decisions

First appeal dismissed by Block Development Officer on 15.1.2009; second appeal dismissed by Standing Committee of Zilla Parishad on 17.8.2009; revision dismissed by Minister on 16.4.2010.

Issues

Whether the property tax levied by Gram Panchayat on industrial land in MIDC area is valid. Whether the revision application under Section 124(6) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 was maintainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the land is not within Gram Panchayat limits and that industrial land in MIDC area is exempt from property tax. Respondents argued that the land is within Gram Panchayat limits and that the Gram Panchayat has power to levy property tax under Section 124 of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The Gram Panchayat has the power to levy property tax on lands and buildings within its limits under Section 124(1) of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The revision application under Section 124(6) is not maintainable against an order passed under Section 124(1). There is no exemption from property tax for industrial units in MIDC area.

Judgment Excerpts

The controversy involved in the petition is in respect of payment of property taxes by the petitioner... The Gram Panchayat has the power to levy property tax on lands and buildings within its limits under Section 124(1) of the Act. The revision application under Section 124(6) was not maintainable because the order of the Block Development Officer was passed under Section 124(1) and not under Section 124(6).

Procedural History

Gram Panchayat issued property tax demand bills for 2006-07 to 2008-09. Petitioner filed first appeal before Block Development Officer, dismissed on 15.1.2009. Second appeal before Standing Committee of Zilla Parishad, dismissed on 17.8.2009. Revision before Minister under Section 124(6), dismissed on 16.4.2010. Writ petition filed in High Court on 2010.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958: 124, 124(1), 124(6)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by National Institute of Industrial Engineering Challenging Trade Union Registration. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for NITIE Under Section 2(a) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Allowing Union R...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes SVLDRS-2 and SVLDRS-3 Statements in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Dispute — Petitioner Entitled to Relief Due to Non-Communication of Error in Declaration. The Designated Committee cannot unilaterally revise the amount payable under Secti...