Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Case — Board Cannot Return Acquired Land Without Government Sanction. Agreement to Release Land After Possession Taken Held Void as Board Lacks Power to Divest Title Under Section 24(2) of Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998.

15 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had upheld an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Co-option of Member in APMC for Violation of Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 — Failure to Provide Notice and Opportunity to Object Renders Co-option Invalid.

26 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Sadashiv Pandurang Patil and Audumbar Gorakh More, were members of the Karmala Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC). They cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Inclusion of Societies in Market Committee Election Process — Failure to Provide Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court quashed the inclusion of respondent societies in the electoral roll of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Mantha, for want of notice and hearing, directing fresh exercise after compliance with natural justice.

28 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Kishanrao Sarjerao More, filed a writ petition challenging the inclusion of several cooperative societies in the electoral roll of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Postponement of APMC Elections Due to Non-Application of Mind. State Government's Order Under Section 14(3) and (3A) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Reasons.

9 Mar 2017

The petitioners, who are agriculturists and office-bearers of cooperative societies that are members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APM...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agriculture Produce Market Committee — No Interference in Mid-Election Process Under Article 226. Inclusion of Names in Voters List Cannot Be Challenged After Election Process Has Commenced; Remedy Lies in Election Petition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

22 Jan 2016

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Chandrashekhar Shivram Mudkanna and Shamshoddin Ghudulal Jamadar against the State of Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acceptance of Nomination for APMC Election Due to Disqualification Under Section 16 of M.S. Act, 1960. Respondent No. 4 was disqualified as a defaulter of a cooperative society, yet nomination was improperly accepted.

18 Jun 2010

The petitioners, Dinkar Uttamrao Patil and Pundlik Raoji Pawar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition by Agricultural Produce Market Committee Against Appointment of Junior Clerks by Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies — Appointment of Employees by Registrar Under Section 27 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Valid Despite Committee's Objections.

6 Jan 2010

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Udgir, through its Chairman, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of respondents No. 2, 3 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Board's Petition, Holds Agricultural Marketing Board is an 'Industry' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Labour Court's jurisdiction upheld as Board engages in systematic activities with employer-employee relationship.

10 Jun 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Agricultural Marketing Board challenging the orders of the Labour Court which held t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging NABARD's Refusal to Register Cooperative Societies as Primary Agricultural Credit Societies. The Court upheld NABARD's decision that multi-purpose societies do not meet the definition of 'primary agricultural credit society' under Section 2(1)(d) of the NABARD Act, 1981.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Abdul Majid Babaso Momin and two cooperative societies, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Process of Agricultural Produce Market Committee for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Article 226. Held that election disputes must be raised before the Election Tribunal under the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, who were voters and candidates in the election of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gangapur, filed two writ petitions under...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)