High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "limitation extension"
1153 result(s) found
Found 1153 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Urban Improvement Trust's Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Delay and Compensation Disputes. Notification under Section 52(1) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 Valid; Compensation Determined and Paid Lawfully.
10 Dec 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Urban Improvement Trust against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had quashed the land...
- 587
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Petitions of Candidates in Kerala Higher Judicial Service Recruitment — High Court's Imposition of Minimum Marks for Viva-Voce After Written Examination Held Arbitrary and Violative of Legitimate Expectation. The Court Applied the Doctrine of Substantive Legitimate Expectation and Article 14 to Quash the High Court's Decision, Directing Selection Based on Original Aggregate Marks Criteria.
11 Jul 2023The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by eleven candidates aspiring to be selected as District Judges...
- 206
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
7 Aug 2020The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...
- 244
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.
20 Aug 2019The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Regularization of MDS Admission for Student Affected by Technical Glitch in CAP Process. Clause 8.3 of Information Brochure for MDS NEET Invoked to Regularize Admission and Permit Examination.
19 Aug 2023The petitioner, Ms. Shaikh Afreen Nooruddin, a student, filed a writ petition seeking regularization of her admission to the MDS (Master of Dental Sur...
- 92
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Revalidate NOC for Construction Near Air Force Station. Refusal based on non-existent policy and without hearing violates principles of natural justice and Article 14.
23 Oct 2023The petitioner, Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati, sole proprietor of Nyati Housing, challenged letters dated 12th May 2021 and 20th September 2021 issued by Resp...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condition of Security for Vacating Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit - Cargo Owner Not Liable for Demurrage and Port Charges as They Are Not Party to Contract of Carriage
23 Mar 2010The appellant, Best Food International Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against an order dated 4th February 2010 passe...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Contract Dispute Over Development of Land — Holds That Work Order Constitutes a Contract and That Termination Without Notice Is Invalid Under Specific Relief Act, 1963. The court also held that the suit for damages was barred by limitation as the cause of action arose in 1991 and the suit was filed in 1999.
6 May 2011The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment and decree dated 13-8-2004 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division at Mapusa in...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Evidence. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to consider the contractor's evidence and counter-claim, and the award being unreasoned, rendered the award patently illegal and in conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
24 Sep 2012The petitioner, M/s. Pancham International, a contractor, was appointed by the Union of India (Respondent No.1) for supply of bush shirts, pants, and ...
- 56
