Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Revalidate NOC for Construction Near Air Force Station. Refusal based on non-existent policy and without hearing violates principles of natural justice and Article 14.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati, sole proprietor of Nyati Housing, challenged letters dated 12th May 2021 and 20th September 2021 issued by Respondent No.4 (Group Captain, Operation ATS) refusing to revalidate a No Objection Certificate (NOC) dated 22nd May 2015. The NOC was originally granted by the Air Force for construction of a building near the Air Force Station, Lohegaon, Pune, subject to certain conditions. The petitioner sought revalidation as the NOC had expired. The respondents refused revalidation citing a policy of 2015 regarding building restrictions near airports, which the petitioner argued did not exist at the time of the original NOC. The court found that the refusal was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner. The court also noted that the policy relied upon was not in existence when the NOC was granted and could not be applied retrospectively. The court quashed the impugned letters and directed the respondents to revalidate the NOC within four weeks, subject to compliance with existing conditions and regulations.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Principles of Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Refusal to revalidate NOC without hearing is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 - The petitioner was not given any opportunity of hearing before the impugned letters were issued, and the refusal was based on a policy that did not exist at the time of the original NOC - Held that such action is unsustainable in law (Paras 7-10).

B) Building Restrictions - Airports and Airfields - NOC Revalidation - Applicability of Policy - The policy of 2015 regarding building restrictions near airports cannot be applied retrospectively to an NOC granted in 2015 without a specific provision - The respondents' reliance on a non-existent policy to deny revalidation is arbitrary - Held that the impugned letters are quashed and the respondents are directed to revalidate the NOC (Paras 11-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the refusal to revalidate a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for construction near an Air Force station, without affording an opportunity of hearing and based on a non-existent policy, is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned letters dated 12th May 2021 and 20th September 2021, and directed the respondents to revalidate the NOC dated 22nd May 2015 within four weeks, subject to compliance with existing conditions and regulations.

Law Points

  • Principles of natural justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Non-arbitrary administrative action
  • Article 14 of the Constitution of India
  • Revalidation of NOC
  • Building restrictions near airports
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 147

WRIT PETITION NO. 8803 OF 2021

2023-10-23

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA

Dr. Milind Sathe, Mr. Saket Mone, Mr. Subit Chakrabarti, Mr. Abhishek Salian i/b. Vidhi Partners for Petitioner; Ms. Savita Ganoo, Mr. D. P. Singh, Mr. Chaitnya Chavan, Mr. Gaurav Baluni for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5; Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo for Respondent No.6

Nitin Dwarkadas Nyati

Union of India, Ministry of Defence, Office In-charge, D ops (ATS), Group Captain, Operation ATS, Command ATC Officer, Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Pune Municipal Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging refusal to revalidate a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for construction near an Air Force station.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of letters dated 12th May 2021 and 20th September 2021 refusing revalidation of NOC, and direction to revalidate the NOC.

Filing Reason

The respondents refused to revalidate the NOC without giving an opportunity of hearing and based on a policy that did not exist at the time of the original NOC.

Issues

Whether the refusal to revalidate the NOC without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice? Whether the refusal based on a non-existent policy is arbitrary and violative of Article 14?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the refusal was arbitrary and without hearing, and that the policy relied upon did not exist at the time of the original NOC. Respondents argued that the revalidation was refused as per the policy of 2015 regarding building restrictions near airports.

Ratio Decidendi

The refusal to revalidate an NOC without affording an opportunity of hearing and based on a policy that did not exist at the time of the original grant is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Administrative actions must be fair, reasonable, and non-arbitrary.

Judgment Excerpts

The refusal to revalidate the NOC without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The policy of 2015 cannot be applied retrospectively to an NOC granted in 2015 without a specific provision.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging the refusal to revalidate the NOC. The court heard the matter and reserved judgment on 16th October 2023, pronouncing it on 23rd October 2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Revalidate NOC for Construction Near Air Force Station. Refusal based on non-existent policy and without hearing violates principles of natural justice and Article 14.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order in MACP Scheme Case Due to Erroneous Interpretation of Grade Pay Entitlement. Employees Entitled to Immediate Next Higher Grade Pay of Rs.5400 Under Clause 8.1 of MACP Scheme and CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, N...