Search Results for "advance purchase"

1273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The appellant, Sri Shivashankar, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Property Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Allegations of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Not Made Out as Dispute Pertained to Non-Payment of Rent Under Leave and License Agreement.

The applicants, Dr. Arun Kumar Barthakur and Basant Kumar Jain, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 454 Cr.P.C. — Sets Aside Confiscation of Rs. 25 Lakhs Deposited by Witness. Confiscation Order Held Without Authority of Law as Money Was Deposited Under Mistaken Order, Not as Fine or Penalty.

The appellant, Shamshad Ahamed, was a witness (PW-122) in a criminal trial (S.C. No. 430 of 2002) involving 33 accused charged with various offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Judgment-Debtor's Petition Seeking Rescission of Contract Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act — Decree-Holder's Failure to Deposit Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time Gives Right to Rescission, Subsequent Deposit Does Not Extinguish That Right.

The petitioner, T.L. Rajagopal, was the defendant/judgment-debtor in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 16.08.1997 filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals and Cross Objection in Specific Performance and Possession Dispute Over KHB Allotted House. Agreement Holder Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute over a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant's Specific Performance Suit for Lack of Readiness and Willingness — Agreement Holder Not Entitled to Equitable Relief. Concurrent findings affirmed that appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute pertains to a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellant, Smt H ...