Search Results for "limited review"

4009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Penalty Against Executive Engineer for Negligence in Rate Justification. Reduction in pay by one stage for one year with cumulative effect confirmed as proportionate penalty under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Shri B.M. Mittal, an Executive Engineer, challenged the judgment and order dated 30.9.2004 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Quo Warranto Petitions Challenging Appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries. Petitioners failed to establish that the appointments violated Article 164(1A) of the Constitution of India as the incumbents were not Members of the Legislative Council.

The petitioners, two Members of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction — Orders Passed Without Deciding Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Are Illegal. Trial Court Must First Decide Preliminary Issue of Jurisdiction Before Proceeding with Interim Applications.

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 13.04.2017 and 17.07.2017 passed by the X...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Hears Two Writ Petitions Regarding Regularisation of Gunthewari Layout Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Developments Act. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Order Dated 20.10.2005 Passed by Nagpur Improvement Trust.

Two writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenging an order dated 20.10.2005 passed by the Chairman, Nagpur Impr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Port Authority's Decision to Remove Employee on Disproportionate Penalty Grounds. The Court examines whether the disciplinary authority violated principles of natural justice and statutory procedure under MPE Regulations, 1964.

The petitioner, a Hindi Translator with the Mormugao Port Trust, faced disciplinary action culminating in his removal from service on 30.4.2011. He wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Order Regarding Development Licenses and Building Plans. Dispute Centers on Compliance with Town Planning Norms and Apartment Ownership Act.

The present batch of civil appeals, with the lead matter arising out of SLP(C) No. 11480 of 2020, originated from the judgment and order dated 10 July...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards of Reinstatement Without Back Wages. Held that daily wage employees who worked for less than 240 days in a year are not entitled to reinstatement under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the employer, Dainik Bhaskar Group (D. B. Corp Ltd), challenging the awards of the Labour Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Smart Classrooms — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. Government Order dated 5.7.2016 quashed as it was passed without hearing the successful bidder and without valid reasons.

The petitioner, M/s Siddharth Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Governme...