WRIT PETITION NOS. 4564, 4565
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Jurisdictional Objection"
1415 result(s) found
Found 1415 result(s)
High Court
Kerala High Court Upholds Decree Holder in Execution of Mandatory Injunction Decree Against Judgment Debtor's Plea of Inexecutability. Concurrent Findings of Unauthorized Construction Beyond Permitted 29.27 Square Meters, Affirmed up to Supreme Court, Precluded Judgment Debtor from Reopening Identification Issue Under Section 47 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
3 Aug 2026The original petition was filed by the judgment debtor in a decree for mandatory injunction challenging the order of the executing court which directe...
High Court
Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.
2 Aug 2024The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...
- 284
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Revisionary Authority on Jurisdiction Ground. Cause of Action Arises at Place of Revisionary Authority's Office Under Article 226(2) of Constitution of India, Not Where Original Adjudication Order Was Passed.
5 Sep 2024The Bombay High Court dealt with a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of six writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Revision...
- 329
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Eviction Suit Against MSEB in Rent Control Dispute — State Government Not the Tenant. The court held that MSEB was the tenant and the suit was maintainable, setting aside the concurrent decrees of the lower courts.
17 Dec 2024The petitioner, The Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (HSBC), filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent judgments of the Small C...
- 495
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Jurisdictional Objection in Foreign Award Enforcement — Implied Exclusion of Part I of Arbitration Act Upheld. Parties' choice of London arbitration and English law impliedly excludes Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, including section 42, so prior section 34 application in Gujarat does not bar Bombay High Court from hearing enforcement petition under section 48.
5 Oct 2011The petitioner, Eitzen Bulk A/S, filed a petition under section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the Bombay High Court seeking...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Investment in Bonds Prior to Sale of Property Does Not Disentitle Deduction Under Section 54EC. The Court held that the assessee had disclosed all material facts and the reopening was based on a change of opinion, thus invalid.
27 Jun 2012The petitioner, Mrs. Parveen P. Bharucha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 31.03.2011 i...
- 152
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. Transfer of Property by Non-Tribal to Another Non-Tribal Does Not Extinguish Right of Original Tribal Transferor.
10 Jul 2019The petitioners, Smt. Leelabai Ashana Totawar and others, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 18.01.2018, which dismissed t...
- 193
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Thane to Nagpur on Grounds of Wife's Convenience. Wife's Convenience Paramount in Matrimonial Transfer Under Section 24 CPC; Nagpur Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Entire State.
19 Sep 2013The applicant wife, Mrs. Sayali Kuber, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu M...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Execution Petition Despite Small Causes Court Decree Alleged Without Jurisdiction — Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree Under Section 47 CPC. The executing court dismissed the darkhast on the ground that the decree was passed without jurisdiction, but the High Court held that the executing court cannot go behind the decree and must execute it as it is.
2 Aug 2006The petitioners, decree holders, obtained a decree dated 14.7.1991 in R.C.S. No. 638/94 from the 2nd Additional Small Causes Court, Nagpur. They filed...
- 82
