Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Thane to Nagpur on Grounds of Wife's Convenience. Wife's Convenience Paramount in Matrimonial Transfer Under Section 24 CPC; Nagpur Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Entire State.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 51
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant wife, Mrs. Sayali Kuber, filed a transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 109 of 2013 from the Court of 3rd Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane to the Family Court at Nagpur. The wife was residing with her parents at Nagpur after leaving the matrimonial home, and had already filed maintenance proceedings and proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act at Nagpur. The husband had filed a petition for nullity of marriage at Thane. The husband raised a preliminary objection that the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the transfer application, as the cause of action arose at Thane and the Thane court was not subordinate to the Nagpur Bench. The court rejected this objection, holding that the High Court is one entity and its benches have jurisdiction over the entire State. On merits, the court held that in matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is paramount. Since the wife resided at Nagpur and had multiple proceedings pending there, transferring the husband's petition to Nagpur would avoid multiplicity of litigation and cause no prejudice to the husband, who could produce witnesses from Mumbai/Thane at Nagpur. The court allowed the transfer application and directed the transfer of the petition to the Family Court at Nagpur.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Territorial Jurisdiction of High Court Bench - Section 24, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a transfer application for a case pending at Thane, as the High Court is one entity and the Bench exercises jurisdiction over the entire State of Maharashtra. The objection based on subordination of courts is not sustainable. (Paras 7-10)

B) Family Law - Transfer of Matrimonial Petition - Convenience of Wife - Section 25, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - In matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is a paramount consideration. The wife, residing at Nagpur with her parents, has filed multiple proceedings at Nagpur, and transferring the husband's petition from Thane to Nagpur would avoid multiplicity of litigation and hardship to the wife. (Paras 11-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain a transfer application for a matrimonial petition pending at Thane, and whether the petition should be transferred to Nagpur for the wife's convenience.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The preliminary objection regarding territorial jurisdiction was rejected. The transfer application was allowed. Hindu Marriage Petition No. 109 of 2013 pending before the 3rd Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane was ordered to be transferred to the Family Court at Nagpur for disposal in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Transfer of matrimonial proceedings
  • territorial jurisdiction of High Court benches
  • convenience of wife as paramount consideration
  • Section 24 CPC
  • Section 25 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (09) 146

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.341 OF 2013

2013-09-19

A.B. Chaudhari, J.

Mr. H.V. Thakur for Applicant, Mr. B.N. Mohta for Respondent

Mrs. Sayali wife of Swapnil Kuber

Swapnil S/o. Harischandra Kuber

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for transfer of a matrimonial petition from Thane to Nagpur.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 109 of 2013 from the Court of 3rd Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane to the Family Court at Nagpur.

Filing Reason

The applicant wife, residing at Nagpur with her parents, had filed maintenance and Domestic Violence Act proceedings at Nagpur, and sought transfer of the husband's nullity petition from Thane to Nagpur for her convenience and to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

Issues

Whether the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain a transfer application for a case pending at Thane. Whether the matrimonial petition should be transferred from Thane to Nagpur on grounds of the wife's convenience.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant wife argued that she resides at Nagpur with her parents, has filed multiple proceedings at Nagpur, and it is inconvenient for her to travel to Thane. Transfer would avoid multiplicity of litigation. Respondent husband raised preliminary objection that Nagpur Bench lacks jurisdiction as cause of action arose at Thane and Thane court is not subordinate to Nagpur Bench. He also argued that his witnesses (doctors) reside at Thane/Mumbai and it would be difficult for him to produce them at Nagpur.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court is one entity and its benches have jurisdiction over the entire State. In matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is a paramount consideration. Transferring the husband's petition to the place where the wife resides and where other proceedings are pending avoids multiplicity of litigation and does not cause prejudice to the husband.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court is one entity and the Bench at Nagpur exercises jurisdiction over the entire State of Maharashtra. In matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is a paramount consideration.

Procedural History

The applicant wife filed Misc. Civil Application No. 341 of 2013 under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 109 of 2013 from Thane to Nagpur. The respondent husband raised a preliminary objection on territorial jurisdiction. The court heard both sides and delivered judgment on 19 September 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24, Section 25
  • Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960: Chapter XXXI Rule 1
  • General Clauses Act, 1897: Clause 3(25)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty Soon Before Death. Presumption under Section 113B of Evidence Act cannot be invoked without proof of demand of dowry and cruelty within ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Matrimonial Petition from Thane to Nagpur on Grounds of Wife's Convenience. Wife's Convenience Paramount in Matrimonial Transfer Under Section 24 CPC; Nagpur Bench Has Jurisdiction Over Entire State.