Search Results for "State Police Complaints Authority"

1126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court hears writ petitions challenging FIR in alleged corruption and land encroachment matter. Petitioners (an ex-MLA and a municipal commissioner) seek quashing of FIR No.4/2017 under PC Act and IPC, arguing political rivalry.

The case pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 CrPC, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Discharge Under MCOC Act — Prima Facie Material Found Sufficient for Trial. The Court held that the Special Judge erred in allowing transfer under Section 11 MCOC Act without considering the prima facie material indicating organized crime.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 2nd September 2002 passed by the learned Special Judge, MCOC Act, Nashik in MCO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing MPID Act Attachment Against Corporate Debtor's Property. Section 32A IBC Overrides MPID Act as Property Acquired Prior to Offence and Corporate Debtor Not Accused.

The petitioner, Dwarka Iron Industries Pvt. Ltd., as the Successful Resolution Applicant of the corporate debtor M/s. Abhirama Steels Limited, filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Against Money Lender Under Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007, Holding That Alleged Acts Constituted Law and Order Issue, Not Public Order. Detention Order Lacked Reasons and No Attempt to Cancel Bail, Hence Violative of Article 21.

The matter arose from a preventive detention order passed against Rajesh, a money lender running ‘Rithika Finance’, by the District Magistrate, Pa...