Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Discharge Under MCOC Act — Prima Facie Material Found Sufficient for Trial. The Court held that the Special Judge erred in allowing transfer under Section 11 MCOC Act without considering the prima facie material indicating organized crime.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 64
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 2nd September 2002 passed by the learned Special Judge, MCOC Act, Nashik in MCOC Case No.2 of 2002. The Special Judge had allowed an application preferred by the respondents (original accused) for transfer of the case under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act). The learned Judge held that there was no material to arrive at a prima facie conclusion that the accused could be prosecuted under the MCOC Act, particularly Section 3 thereof. The prosecution case, in brief, was that on 18th July 2001 at about 10.30 to 11.00 p.m., the complainant Jakir Hamid Shah and his friends were discussing business at Islami Chowk, Ward No.2, Shrirampur. At that time, some accused persons passed by and threatened one Gabbar @ Ansar Kureshi, stating that he was saved last time but now cannot be saved. Later, they returned with deadly weapons like swords and koytas. The High Court, in appeal, considered whether the Special Judge's order was sustainable. The Court noted that the appeal was initially filed as a revision but was converted into an appeal as the order was appealable under the MCOC Act. The High Court found that there was sufficient prima facie material to proceed against the accused under the MCOC Act and set aside the impugned order, directing the Special Judge to proceed with the case in accordance with law.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - MCOC Act - Transfer of Case - Section 11 MCOC Act, 1999 - The Special Judge allowed transfer of case before framing charges holding no prima facie material for Section 3 MCOC Act - The High Court held that the order was appealable and set aside the same, finding sufficient prima facie material to proceed against the accused under MCOC Act (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Special Judge erred in allowing the transfer application under Section 11 of MCOC Act on the ground of no prima facie material for prosecution under Section 3 of MCOC Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order dated 2nd September 2002 set aside. Special Judge directed to proceed with the case in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Prima facie case
  • MCOC Act Section 3
  • organized crime
  • transfer of case
  • appellate jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (09) 53

Criminal Appeal No.73 of 2005

2006-09-29

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.

Shri P.S. Hingorani, Asstt. Public Prosecutor for appellant; Shri S.R. Chitnis, Sr. Advocate for respondents

The State of Maharashtra through SDPO, Shrirampur City Police Station, Shrirampur, District Ahamednagar

Bharat Baburao Gavhane and 13 others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal by State against order allowing transfer of case under MCOC Act

Remedy Sought

State sought setting aside of the Special Judge's order allowing transfer of case

Filing Reason

Special Judge allowed transfer application on ground of no prima facie material for prosecution under Section 3 MCOC Act

Previous Decisions

Special Judge, MCOC Act, Nashik allowed transfer application on 2nd September 2002 in MCOC Case No.2 of 2002

Issues

Whether the Special Judge erred in allowing transfer under Section 11 MCOC Act on the ground of no prima facie material for Section 3 MCOC Act

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant-State argued that there was sufficient prima facie material to proceed under MCOC Act Respondents-accused supported the Special Judge's order

Ratio Decidendi

The Special Judge's finding of no prima facie material for Section 3 MCOC Act was erroneous; there was sufficient material to proceed against the accused under the MCOC Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Judge has allowed an application preferred by the respondents-original accused for transfer of the case under section 11 of MCOC Act, 1999. In the view of learned Judge the application preferred by the accused, prior to framing of charges, is capable of being allowed because there is no material to arrive at a prima facie conclusion that the accused can be prosecuted under the MCOC Act and more particularly section 3 thereof.

Procedural History

The Special Judge, MCOC Act, Nashik allowed transfer application on 2nd September 2002. State initially filed revision which was converted into appeal. High Court heard and allowed appeal on 29th September 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Act): 3, 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Stick Assault Case. Appellants convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC for causing death of deceased by stick blows, acquitted of murder under Section...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Discharge Under MCOC Act — Prima Facie Material Found Sufficient for Trial. The Court held that the Special Judge erred in allowing transfer under Section 11 MCOC Act without considering the prima facie...