Search Results for "Plaint averments"

2025 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2025 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale in Favor of Flat Purchaser Against Developer and Subsequent Purchasers. Agreement for Sale dated 6th March 1980 declared valid and binding, subsequent agreement dated 4th April 1988 declared bogus and invalid.

The case involves a dispute over the specific performance of an agreement for sale of a flat. The flat purchaser, Dr. Arun Subrao Prabhu, entered into...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Leave to Sue Under Section 92 CPC for Public Trust Dispute. Section 52 of Maharashtra Public Trust Act Bars Application of Sections 92 and 93 CPC to Public Trusts.

The petitioners, members of Mahad Taluka Maratha Seva Sangh, a trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 and the Societies Registr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Dismissed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiffs, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Appointment of Receiver in Suit for Specific Performance — Appellant's Alienation of Property During Pendency of Suit Held Contumacious. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applied to Protect Plaintiffs' Rights.

The appeal arose from an order appointing a Receiver over a property in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction. The plaintiffs (resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Agreement to Sell Proved, Limitation and Benami Transaction Objections Rejected.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance of Contract in Property Sale Dispute. Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell house decreed as plaintiff proved readiness and willingness to perform her part of contract.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by original defendant No. 2, Venunath Sambha More, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in SARFAESI Act Suit. Court Holds That Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act Is Not Absolute and Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction to Examine Legality of Proceedings.

The petitioners, Jalgaon Peoples Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its authorized officer, challenged an order dated 27.09.2016 passed by the 6th Joint Civil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Filed by Newspaper Publisher Against Advertising Agency for Unpaid Bills. Court Decrees Suit for Principal Amount with Interest at 6% Per Annum.

The appellant, Kasturi and Sons Ltd., publisher of 'The Hindu' and other publications, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.10,03,322.50/- against the resp...