Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Filed by Newspaper Publisher Against Advertising Agency for Unpaid Bills. Court Decrees Suit for Principal Amount with Interest at 6% Per Annum.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Kasturi and Sons Ltd., publisher of 'The Hindu' and other publications, filed a suit for recovery of Rs.10,03,322.50/- against the respondents, an advertising agency and its partners, for unpaid advertisement bills from November 1999 to March 2000. The trial court dismissed the suit for non-prosecution on 1 July 2017. The appellant appealed under Section 96 CPC. The High Court noted that the respondents did not appear despite service and that the trial court's dismissal was not justified. The court examined the plaint and found that the plaintiff had established a running account and that the defendants had not paid the outstanding amount. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the trial court's judgment, and decreed the suit for the principal amount of Rs.8,72,298.50/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization, along with costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - First Appeal under Section 96 CPC - Dismissal of Suit for Non-Prosecution - The trial court dismissed the suit for default when the plaintiff's counsel was absent. The High Court held that the dismissal was not justified as the suit was of 2014 and the plaintiff had a valid claim. The appeal was allowed and the suit was decreed. (Paras 1-20)

B) Contract - Recovery of Money - Running Account - The plaintiff, a newspaper publisher, engaged the defendant advertising agency for advertisements. The defendant enjoyed credit facilities and payments were due. The court found that the defendant had not paid the outstanding amount of Rs.8,72,298.50/- with interest at 23.5% per annum. The suit was decreed for the principal amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization. (Paras 3-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court was justified in dismissing the suit for non-prosecution and whether the appellant is entitled to recovery of the suit amount with interest.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment and decree dated 1 July 2017 in O.S.No.3534 of 2014 passed by the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, is set aside. The suit is decreed for a sum of Rs.8,72,298.50/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization, along with costs.

Law Points

  • Order 41 Rule 1 CPC
  • Section 96 CPC
  • Recovery of money
  • Running account
  • Interest on delayed payment
  • Indian Newspaper Society accreditation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:MHC:1801

AS No. 309 of 2018

2026-04-10

N. Mala

2026:MHC:1801

Ms.R.Vaishnavi Sri for M/s.R and P Partners

Kasturi and Sons Ltd.

M/s.Adworld, Mr.P.N.Venkataraman, Mr.B.Shanmugam

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against dismissal of suit for recovery of money.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the trial court's judgment and decree and to recover Rs.10,03,322.50/- with interest.

Filing Reason

The trial court dismissed the suit for non-prosecution on 1 July 2017.

Previous Decisions

The trial court (IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai) dismissed O.S.No.3534 of 2014 on 1 July 2017.

Issues

Whether the trial court was justified in dismissing the suit for non-prosecution. Whether the appellant is entitled to recovery of the suit amount with interest.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the trial court erred in dismissing the suit for default as the suit was of 2014 and the plaintiff had a valid claim. Respondents did not appear despite service.

Ratio Decidendi

The trial court's dismissal for non-prosecution was not justified as the plaintiff had a valid claim and the defendants had not paid the outstanding amount. The plaintiff is entitled to recovery of the principal amount with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.3534 of 2014 dated 01.07.2017, rejecting the appellants suit for recovery of sum of Rs.10,03,322.50/- together with interest from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realisation. The plaintiff states that the account between the plaintiff and the defendants was a running account and that the payments used to be made by the defendants, within the credit period of 60 days from the last date on which the advertisement appeared.

Procedural History

The appellant filed O.S.No.3534 of 2014 before the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, for recovery of money. The trial court dismissed the suit for non-prosecution on 1 July 2017. The appellant filed the present first appeal under Section 96 CPC read with Order 41 Rule 1 CPC before the Madras High Court, which was allowed on 10 April 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Section 96, Order 41 Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Filed by Newspaper Publisher Against Advertising Agency for Unpaid Bills. Court Decrees Suit for Principal Amount with Interest at 6% Per Annum.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Dental College to Fill Vacant Seats Through Management Quota After State Counseling Process Concludes. Unaided Private College Not Required to Surrender Vacant Seats to State After Centralized Admission Rounds.