Search Results for "substantially same issues"

1764 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1764 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Removal of Municipal Councillors and Appointment of Administrator. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 41 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 in Removal Orders.

The matter comprised two writ petitions. W.P. No. 101601/2025 was filed by elected councillors of Gadag-Betageri City Municipal Council challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Rectification Petition Filed by Le Shark Apparel Limited Seeking Cancellation of Respondents' Registered Trade Mark No. 466002 in Class 25. Petition Based on Grounds of Non-Use Under Section 47 and Fraudulent Registration Under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Le Shark Apparel Limited, filed a Commercial Miscellaneous Petition before the High Court of Bombay seeking rectification of the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Limitation Issue Regarding Temple Property Alienations. High Court had applied Art. 134-B of Limitation Act, 1908 and rejected adverse possession claim since alienor was alive.

The dispute concerned lands granted in inam to a temple. By 1929, the manager of the temple had sold all the properties through various sale deeds and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Police Action and Reference for Contempt in Lalita Kumari Compliance Case. Court holds that petitioner failed to demonstrate any violation of directions in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. and that the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order was not perverse.

The petitioner, Vishwas Sudhanshu Bhamburkar, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Berth Reservation Dispute. Court Examines Whether the Claim Was Barred by Limitation and Whether the Award Was Patently Illegal Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment of the Madras High Court in OSA (CAD) No. 39 of 2021 involved an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a...