Search Results for "consumer protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "consumer protection"

780 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 780 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Privatisation of District Hospital in Public Interest Litigation — State Directed to Commission and Run Asilo Hospital as State District Hospital. The Court granted interim relief to prevent handing over of the District Hospital to a private operator, upholding the State's obligation to provide healthcare.

12 Aug 2011

The judgment concerns two matters: Misc. Civil Application No. 623/2011 in PIL Writ Petition No. 359/2007 and Writ Petition No. 394/2011, both filed i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.

31 Mar 2012

The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking to Restrain Former Additional Judges from Practicing in Lower Courts. Article 220 of the Constitution does not apply to Additional Judges who resigned before confirmation, as they are not 'permanent Judges' within the meaning of the provision.

2 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Nitin Shankar Deshpande, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking to restrain Respondents 5 to 9, who were ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Shareholders for Alleged Scandalous Allegations in Legal Proceedings. Filing of false cases does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes the court or impedes administration of justice under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

31 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC), filed a contempt petition against respondent shareholders Sureshchandra V. Par...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Removal of Assets in Commercial Suit Despite Arbitration Clause — Interim Relief Granted Under Order 39 CPC. Trial Court Directed to Decide Interim Application on Merits Without Considering Maintainability Based on Arbitration Clause.

7 Aug 2019

The petitioner, INOX Leisure Limited, filed a commercial suit against Indo Pacific Projects Limited seeking recovery of security deposit and permissio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Release of Marathi Film 'Mukkam Post' in Copyright Infringement Suit. Court finds prima facie case of substantial similarity between plaintiff's script and defendants' film, and balance of convenience in favour of plaintiff.

24 Oct 2025

The plaintiff, Everest Entertainment LLP, filed a suit for copyright infringement against the defendants, including Mahesh Vaman Manjrekar, Great Mara...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case: Filing of Complaint Before Expiry of 15-Day Notice Period Is Not Fatal If Cognizance Is Taken After the Period. The Court held that the date of taking cognizance, not the date of filing, determines compliance with Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

22 Oct 2019

The appellant, Rambhau Tulsiram Bhusari, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Allotment of Fair Price Shop to Handicapped Backward Class Applicant in Priority Category Dispute. Controller's decision to allot to petitioner who fell under multiple priority categories was upheld against challenge by another applicant.

4 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Kum. Sushama Kashinath Boir, applied for allotment of a Fair Price Shop pursuant to an advertisement dated 25th June, 2001 under Item ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

13 Mar 2013

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Goldstar Metal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s...

68 69 70 71 72

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)