Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Release of Marathi Film 'Mukkam Post' in Copyright Infringement Suit. Court finds prima facie case of substantial similarity between plaintiff's script and defendants' film, and balance of convenience in favour of plaintiff.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Everest Entertainment LLP, filed a suit for copyright infringement against the defendants, including Mahesh Vaman Manjrekar, Great Maratha, Krizolh Filmz LLP, Satyasai Productions Private Limited, Rahul Sughand, Rahul Puranik, and Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited, seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the Marathi film 'Mukkam Post'. The plaintiff claimed that it owned the copyright in the script of 'Mukkam Post' through an assignment from the author, and that the defendants' film was substantially similar to its script. The court compared the plaintiff's script with the defendants' film and found striking similarities in the storyline, characters, and key scenes. The court held that the plaintiff had made out a strong prima facie case of copyright infringement. The balance of convenience was in favour of the plaintiff as the film had not yet been released, and the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from releasing the film 'Mukkam Post' until the disposal of the suit. The court also directed the defendants to file their written statements within four weeks.

Headnote

A) Copyright Law - Interim Injunction - Prima Facie Case - Section 14, 51, 55, 62 Copyright Act, 1957 - Plaintiff claimed copyright in script 'Mukkam Post' and alleged that defendants' film 'Mukkam Post' infringed the same - Court found substantial similarity between plaintiff's script and defendants' film based on comparison of story, characters, and scenes - Held that plaintiff has made out a strong prima facie case for grant of interim injunction (Paras 10-25).

B) Copyright Law - Balance of Convenience - Irreparable Loss - Section 55 Copyright Act, 1957 - Plaintiff sought injunction to prevent release of film pending trial - Court held that balance of convenience lies in favour of plaintiff as defendants had not yet released the film and plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss if injunction is not granted - Held that defendants can be compensated by damages if ultimately successful (Paras 26-30).

C) Copyright Law - Assignment of Copyright - Exclusive License - Section 18, 19 Copyright Act, 1957 - Plaintiff claimed to be exclusive licensee of script from author - Court noted that assignment deed was executed and plaintiff had exclusive rights - Held that plaintiff has locus standi to sue for infringement (Paras 5-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for grant of interim injunction restraining the defendants from releasing the film 'Mukkam Post' on the ground of copyright infringement in the script and cinematograph film.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Interim injunction granted restraining defendants from releasing the film 'Mukkam Post' until disposal of the suit. Defendants directed to file written statements within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Copyright Act
  • 1957
  • Section 14
  • Section 51
  • Section 55
  • Section 62
  • prima facie case
  • balance of convenience
  • irreparable loss
  • substantial similarity
  • cinematograph film
  • script
  • literary work
  • assignment of copyright
  • exclusive licensee
  • interim injunction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-OS:19882

Interim Application L. No. 33036 of 2025 in Commercial IP L. No. 32984 of 2025 with Leave Petition L. No. 33041 of 2025

2025-10-24

Amit S. Jamsandekar

2025:BHC-OS:19882

Ravindra Suryawanshi, Tanvi Nandgaonkar, Archis Bhatt, Amogh Prasad Khadye for Plaintiff; Harshand Bhadbhade, Gouresh Mogre, Dileep Satale, Shagufa Patel, Vedastu Rane, Atreya Tambe, Saaniya Sait for Defendant No. 1 and 4; Mandar Soman for Defendant Nos. 2,3,5 & 6; Kunal Mehta, Kunal Parekh, Nirali Atha for Defendant No. 7

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for copyright infringement seeking interim injunction to restrain release of film.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks interim injunction restraining defendants from releasing the film 'Mukkam Post' and other reliefs.

Filing Reason

Plaintiff alleges that defendants' film 'Mukkam Post' infringes its copyright in the script of the same name.

Issues

Whether the plaintiff has a prima facie case of copyright infringement. Whether the balance of convenience lies in favour of the plaintiff. Whether the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss if injunction is not granted.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that it is the exclusive licensee of the script 'Mukkam Post' and that defendants' film is substantially similar to its script. Defendants argued that the script is not original and that there is no infringement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that where there is substantial similarity between the plaintiff's copyrighted work and the defendants' work, and the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case, the balance of convenience lies in favour of granting an interim injunction to prevent irreparable loss.

Judgment Excerpts

When the above-listed Suit and the Interim Application filed by the Plaintiff were called out today... The court compared the plaintiff's script with the defendants' film and found striking similarities...

Procedural History

The suit and interim application were filed on an unspecified date. The court heard the matter on October 24, 2025, and passed the interim order on the same day.

Acts & Sections

  • Copyright Act, 1957: 14, 51, 55, 62, 18, 19
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147(a) for Income Tax on Minimum Guarantee Receipts from Film Sale. Assessee's Failure to Disclose Full Consideration for Sale of Movie 'Charas' Justifies Reassessment Despite Partial Ac...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Release of Marathi Film 'Mukkam Post' in Copyright Infringement Suit. Court finds prima facie case of substantial similarity between plaintiff's script and defendants' film, and balance of conve...