Search Results for "water supply contract"

604 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 604 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Summary Suit for Recovery of Contractual Payment in Earth Filling Work Dispute. Court holds that plaintiff proved contract and performance, and defendant failed to prove defence of poor quality or inflated claims.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai, carrying on business as a proprietress in civil construction works under the name M/s. Sterling Engineering Co.,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in VAT Case — Running Bills of Water Supply Board Not Tax Invoices. Karnataka Water Supply Board is not 'Government' under KVAT Rules, hence its Running Bills cannot be treated as Tax Invoices for input tax credit.

The State of Karnataka filed a Sales Tax Revision Petition under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Release of Contractual Payment Due to Disputed Facts. Court holds that disputed questions of fact regarding work completion and measurement cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. GVPR Engineers Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.

Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice in Electricity Dispute — Petitioner Not Liable for Predecessor's Dues. BESCOM Cannot Recover Arrears from Auction Purchaser Without Proper Notice Under Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, K.N. Sakrappa, proprietor of Sri Maheshwari Industries, filed a writ petition challenging a demand notice dated 26.12.2014 issued by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Setting Aside Compensation Levy in Construction Contract Dispute. Levy of Compensation Under Clause 2 of GCC Invalid for Non-Compliance with Contractual Mechanism of Show Cause Notice and Quantification.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising from a construction contract between the General Manager, Heavy Water Plant (Manuguru) (petiti...