Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition for Allowances and Increments for Desalination Project Workers — Non-absorption in Regular Scale Does Not Bar Routine Increments and Allowances. Petitioners, who worked for over 10 years without absorption, were denied allowances and increments under G.O.(D)No.46; court held that non-absorption does not disentitle them from routine increments and allowances under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, G.Venkatesh, S.Shanmuga Sundara Chokkalingam, and P.Christopher, were employed by the TWAD Board in a desalination project. The first two were skilled labourers as Electrical Operators, and the third was a Chemist. They had worked continuously for over 10 years without being absorbed into the regular time scale of pay. The Inspector of Factories, Sivagangai, issued orders under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, confirming their permanent status, but the TWAD Board did not implement these orders and filed a writ petition against them. The petitioners also filed a writ petition for implementation. The Government issued G.O.(D)No.46 dated 10.02.2021, which denied them any other allowance and increment. The petitioners sought to partially quash that portion of the G.O. and sought directions to grant all allowances and routine increments as per the time scale. The court, after hearing the counsels, allowed the writ petition, holding that non-absorption in the regular scale does not disentitle the petitioners from routine increments and allowances. The court directed the respondents to grant all other allowances and sanction routine increments as per the time scale of pay.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Increments and Allowances - Non-absorption in Regular Scale - Petitioners were skilled labourers and chemist working continuously for over 10 years in a desalination project without absorption in regular time scale - The impugned G.O. denied them any other allowance and increment - Court held that non-absorption does not disentitle them from routine increments and allowances - Directed the respondents to grant all other allowances and sanction routine increments as per time scale (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, who were not absorbed in the regular time scale of pay, are entitled to routine increments and allowances as per the time scale of pay.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to grant all other allowances and sanction all routine increments as per the time scale of pay to the petitioners.

Law Points

  • Non-absorption in regular time scale does not disentitle employees from routine increments and allowances
  • Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act 1981
  • Article 226 of Constitution of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 69

W.P.(MD)No.20725 of 2021

2025-01-27

L.VICTORIA GOWRI

Mr.S.Viswalingam (for petitioners), Mr.D.Gandhiraj (for 1st respondent), Mr.P.Veera Kathiravan (for 2nd respondent)

G.Venkatesh, S.Shanmuga Sundara Chokkalingam, P.Christopher

The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Chennai; The Managing Director, TWAD Board, Chennai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking partial quashing of Government Order and direction to grant allowances and increments.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to partially quash G.O.(D)No.46 dated 10.02.2021 insofar as it denied them any other allowance and increment, and sought direction to grant all other allowances and sanction routine increments as per time scale.

Filing Reason

The Government Order denied the petitioners any other allowance and increment despite their continuous service for over 10 years and orders of Inspector of Factories conferring permanent status.

Previous Decisions

Inspector of Factories, Sivagangai, issued orders dated 11.07.2011 under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981, confirming petitioners' permanent status. TWAD Board filed W.P. No.13038 of 2011 against those orders. Petitioners filed W.P. (MD) No.9549 of 2012 for implementation.

Issues

Whether the petitioners, who were not absorbed in the regular time scale of pay, are entitled to routine increments and allowances as per the time scale of pay.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they worked continuously for over 10 years and were entitled to routine increments and allowances despite non-absorption. Respondents likely opposed on grounds of non-absorption in regular scale.

Ratio Decidendi

Non-absorption in the regular time scale of pay does not disentitle employees from receiving routine increments and allowances as per the time scale.

Judgment Excerpts

They were all serving in the desalination project for more than 10 years continuously without any break. The Inspector of Factories, Sivagangai, considering their pathetic situation made detailed enquiries, issued specific orders under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act 1981, confirming the petitioners job mentioned above.

Procedural History

Inspector of Factories issued orders on 11.07.2011 conferring permanent status. TWAD Board filed W.P. No.13038 of 2011 against those orders. Petitioners filed W.P. (MD) No.9549 of 2012 for implementation. Government issued G.O.(D)No.46 on 10.02.2021 denying allowances and increments. Petitioners filed the present writ petition on 2021. The petition was reserved on 29.10.2024 and delivered on 27.01.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981:
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against High Court Order Treating Tanti Caste as Scheduled Caste — State Notification Merging Tanti with SC List Held Illegal Under Article 341. The respondent, originally appointed under OBC category, c...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute. Court holds that mutation entries do not confer title and that the petitioners failed to establish any legal right or entitlement to the property.