KAHC030058312022_1
25 Jun 2024...
Search Results for "unreasonable inaction"
307 result(s) found
Found 307 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Service Tax Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction. Refundable deposit received from SEZ developer not taxable as service, and 10-year delay in issuing SCN violates principles of natural justice.
25 Jul 2023The petitioner, Coventry Estates Pvt. Ltd. (formerly S and H Services Pvt. Ltd.), was engaged in construction of a residential complex in a Special Ec...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification of Directors in Co-operative Housing Society Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Order of Assistant Registrar set aside as show cause notice lacked grounds and no hearing was given before disqualification under Section 75 of Goa Co-operative Societies Act, 2001.
7 Jan 2016The petitioners, four members of the Board of Directors of M/s Sapana Garden Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, challenged an order dated 8.1.2015 pass...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Refusal to Condone Delay in Appeal Against Termination. Petitioner's Multiple Forums and Unexplained Delay of Over Three Years Justified Rejection of Condonation Application.
1 Oct 2015The petitioner, Popat Sitaram Godge, was terminated from service on 22.05.1994 by the respondent educational institution. Instead of filing an appeal ...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Accountant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Petitioner, a Senior Division Accounts Officer, was accused of criminal breach of trust and conspiracy for failing to object to irregular purchases, but the court held that sanction for prosecution was mandatory as the alleged acts were in discharge of official duty.
11 Aug 2006The petitioner, Prakash Vasudeo Tare, was a Senior Division Accounts Officer in the employment of the Accountant General (A. & E.) II Maharashtra, Nag...
- 108
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion of 467 Days Under Section 14 of Limitation Act for Filing Section 34 Application Under Arbitration Act. The court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply to applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the Union of India failed to demonstrate due diligence.
24 Apr 2017The petitioner, M/s DDL Excavation Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, Union of India (UOI), entered into an agreement for execution of works in Goa. Dispu...
- 150
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.
11 Oct 2013The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Second Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in First Appeal — Finding of First Appellate Court Held Perverse. The Court set aside the order rejecting condonation of delay and restored the first appeal for hearing on merits, emphasizing that the appellate Court must consider all relevant facts.
29 Oct 2013The case arises from a second appeal against the judgment of the first appellate Court dated 26.7.2011 in Misc. Civil Application No.291 of 2011, whic...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Investigation into Missing Husband After 16 Years — Inordinate Delay and Lack of Evidence Lead to Dismissal. Petition under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC for direction to investigate complaint of 2002 dismissed as no FIR was registered and unexplained delay of 16 years.
28 Sep 2022The petitioner, Sushilabai w/o Vaijinath Pawar, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the C...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Benefit to Development Officer. Court holds that the Scheme's eligibility conditions are clear and the petitioner's application was rightly rejected as he did not meet the qualifying service requirement.
8 Mar 2019The petitioner, K.G.H. Dodhiya, joined the New India Assurance Company Limited as a Development Officer on 16 April 1977 and later became an Administr...
- 140
