KAHC010422252008_1
17 Dec 2014...
Search Results for "sanction under Section 279"
189 result(s) found
Found 189 result(s)
High Court
KAHC010645132024_1
19 Dec 2025The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...
- 41
High Court
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.
3 Mar 2017The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Slum Rehabilitation Area Declaration Where No Show Cause Notice Was Issued. The Court Examines Whether Principles of Natural Justice Require Opportunity of Hearing Before Section 3C(1) Declaration Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.
11 May 2011This writ petition was filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the declaration of certain property as a Slum Rehabilitation Area under Section 3C(1...
- 79
High Court
- 91
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Stays Gauhati High Court's Direction to Prosecute Motor Vehicle Offences Only Under MV Act — Issue of Prosecution Under IPC Left Open. The Court Held That the MV Act Is Primarily a Beneficial Legislation for Compensation and Chapter XIII Deals with Regulatory Offences, Not Barring IPC Prosecution.
4 Oct 2019The case arose from a judgment of the Gauhati High Court, Agartala bench, dated 22.12.2008, which held that road traffic offences should be prosecuted...
- 548
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Offences. Accused challenges eyewitness testimony, FSL report discrepancy, and claims benefit of grave and sudden provocation under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC.
12 Jul 2023The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal appeal filed by the accused challenging his conviction and sentence dated 07.09.2016 by the ...
- 28
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 939
High Court
KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
- 69
