Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

230 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that pre-amended provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 apply to arbitration requests received before 23rd October, 2015, and the High Court must respect the agreed appointment procedure.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petition - ONGC Challenges Umpire’s Award Granting Six Days’ Extension in Pipeline Project. Petition contends that the extension was granted in breach of contract clauses 5.9 and 41.8 and without evidence, after rejecting the related claim for cost of repairs.

12 Aug 2014

The dispute arose from a contract dated 6 November 1989 between Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) as employer and a consortium of foreign...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitrator Appointment in BPCL Dispute — No Bias Found in Sole Arbitrator Being an Employee of the Respondent Company. The court held that mere employment does not create automatic disqualification under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and petitioners failed to show actual bias.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns five arbitration petitions filed by different companies (Faridabad Metal Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Hindustan Wires Limited Ltd., Universa...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rejects Petitioners' Choice of Forum in Section 29-A Extension and Section 9 Petitions Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Prior District Court Consent. District Court Consent for Two Extensions Under Section 29-A Reaffirmed Original Seat at Karjat/Thane, Rendering Section 42 Bar to High Court Jurisdiction.

29 Jul 2025

The dispute arose from two agreements between the petitioners, who were landowners, and the respondents, who were purchasers, relating to land at Karj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Cross-Petitions Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute; Award Directed Payment of Rs. 96.20 Lakhs Plus Interest and Costs for Non-Delivery of Equipment Under Purchase Order, While Supplier Challenged Deduction for Support Services.

2 Dec 2025

Background: The case involved cross-petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award dated 30 Ma...

High Court

High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute Despite Unstamped Agreement. Arbitration Clause Held Separable and Enforceable Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioners, Mr. M.N. Kumar, Mr. R. Venkata Krishna, and Mr. C.S. Mohan, filed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitrati...

High Court

High Court of Bombay addresses the legal effect of unilateral arbitrator appointments made prior to 23 October 2015 in light of the 2015 amendment to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court examines whether such appointments are void ab initio and the jurisdiction of the executing court to entertain challenges at the execution stage.

4 Aug 2026

The judgment concerns a reference from the Executing Court in a batch of execution applications filed by M/s. S. E. Investments Ltd. (now Paisalo Digi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Arbitration Dispute Over Interest and Contract Interpretation. The Court held that arbitral tribunals have the power to award compound interest under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and that a Memorandum of Understanding merged into an Implementation Agreement for arbitration purposes based on contractual terms.

7 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court addressed two civil appeals arising from a common judgment of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in an arbitration dispute between U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Arbitration for Lack of Arbitration Agreement. Developer Fails to Prove Existence of Arbitration Clause in Development Agreement with Cooperative Housing Society.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Panama Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challeng...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears multiple arbitration petitions filed by various petitioners against the same respondent. The petitions, bearing consecutive numbers, seek relief under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Apr 2025

...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)