Search Results for "Section 25(3) Limitation Act"

104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Valid Despite Non-Examination of Attesting Witness. Execution of sale deed can be proved by other evidence under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 when attesting witness is dead.

The appellant-plaintiff, Sri Thammaiah, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction (later amended to possession) in respect of sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal Against Resolution Plan Approval in Insolvency Case. Municipal Corporation's Prior Consent to Resolution Plan Precludes Later Objections Under IBC.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) appealed against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which had upheld ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sanction Order in Disproportionate Assets Case Against IRS Officer — Sanctioning Authority Failed to Apply Independent Mind and Relied on CBI Report Without Proper Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Vivek Batra, an Indian Revenue Service officer, challenged the sanction order dated 09.10.2012 granted by the Union of India for his p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages for Delayed and Undelivered LPG Cylinders. Arbitrator's interpretation of contractual clauses upheld as not contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. R.M. Cylinders Private Limited, challenged an arbitral award dated 30 August 2010 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of...