KAHC010068412019_1
16 Aug 2019...
Search Results for "Section 13(1)"
1508 result(s) found
Found 1508 result(s)
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"
25 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...
- 502
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Issue of Accord and Satisfaction to be Decided by Arbitrator Under Section 11(6A) of Arbitration Act, 1996. The Court held that the High Court erred in refusing appointment on ground of full and final settlement, as the limited jurisdiction under Section 11(6A) only permits examination of existence of arbitration agreement.
5 May 2023The appellant, M/s. Shree Vishnu Constructions, entered into an agreement with the respondents (Military Engineering Service) on 22.07.2010 for constr...
- 162
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Despite Insolvency Proceedings. Criminal Liability Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Continues Simultaneously with Insolvency Resolution Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as Proceedings are Penal and Not Covered by Moratorium Under Section 14.
15 Mar 2023The dispute arose from a dishonoured cheque issued by M/s Rainbow Papers Limited, a company, to Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited, a public...
- 364
High Court
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Eating House Licence for Lack of Personal Liability — Licencee Not Vicariously Liable for Acts of Employees Without Prior Knowledge or Consent Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The court held that the licencee cannot be held vicariously liable for the acts of his employees unless it is shown that the acts were done with his knowledge or consent or that he failed to exercise due diligence.
16 Nov 2011The petitioner, Shri Appu M. Shetty, aged 70 years, is the proprietor of Hotel Sona, an eating house with a permit room located in Goregaon, Mumbai. H...
- 254
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.
8 Nov 2006The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...
- 27
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upheld Municipal Board's Imposition of Water Tax in U.P. Municipalities Act Case — Procedural Defects Cured by s.135(3). Defects in Publication of Tax Proposal Not Fatal if Object of Informing Inhabitants Is Achieved and No Substantial Prejudice Caused, Under Sections 131(3) and 135(3) of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916.
16 Jan 1969The Municipal Board, Sitapur, initiated proceedings to levy water tax under section 126(1)(x) of the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. A special resoluti...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Proceedings for Lack of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act. Directors Contend Complaints Merely Name Them Without Alleging Active Role in Day-to-Day Affairs.
1 Jul 2026The case concerns multiple criminal petitions filed by Kavitha Chopra and Dhirendra Chopra, directors of OSIA Hyper Retail Limited, seeking to quash p...
- 40
