Search Results for "New Recruitment Policy"

676 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 676 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010211662021_1

Background: The case involves multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Promotion Dispute — Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Rules. Promotion to Assistant Regional Transport Officer must be based on statutory rules, not executive instructions, and seniority cannot be ignored.

The case involves two appeals by the State of Odisha against a common judgment of the Orissa High Court, which dismissed intra-court appeals by the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Absorption of Reserved Panel Candidate After Panel Expiry. Direction to absorb respondent as Technician in All India Radio set aside as it violated Recruitment Rules and the limited right of a candidate in a reserved panel.

The Union of India and All India Radio appealed against a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court's direction to absorb the respondent, as a Technic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Policy for Air Vice Marshal Based on Seniority-cum-Merit. Air Commodore's Challenge Dismissed as Policy Valid and No Right to Promotion.

The appellant, Air Commodore Naveen Jain, was commissioned in the Indian Air Force in 1981 and promoted to Air Commodore in 2011. He was considered fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MAT Order Directing Age Relaxation for Dental Surgeons Under Maharashtra Recruitment Rules. Contractual Service Status Under National Health Mission and Applicability of Rule 3(b) of the Directorate of Health Service Recruitment Rules, 1990 Are Core Issues.

The matter arose from a recruitment process for 189 Dental Surgeon posts initiated by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) in 2015. The or...