Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Absorption of Reserved Panel Candidate After Panel Expiry. Direction to absorb respondent as Technician in All India Radio set aside as it violated Recruitment Rules and the limited right of a candidate in a reserved panel.

  • 134
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Union of India and All India Radio appealed against a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court's direction to absorb the respondent, as a Technician in the Eastern Zone of All India Radio under the Scheduled Castes category. The respondent had been placed at Serial No. 1 in a Reserved Panel formed in 1999 for three SC vacancies. However, he was not appointed within the panel's validity. The High Court directed his absorption, which the appellants challenged as enlarging the right of a reserved panel candidate beyond the panel's expiry and contrary to Recruitment Rules. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that a candidate in a reserved panel has no right to appointment after the panel expires, and set aside the High Court's direction.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Absorption - Reserved Panel - Expiry of Panel - The issue was whether a candidate placed in a Reserved Panel for the post of Technician in All India Radio could be directed to be absorbed after the panel had expired. The Supreme Court held that a candidate in a reserved panel has no vested right to appointment after the panel expires, and the High Court's direction to absorb the respondent was contrary to the Recruitment Rules. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a candidate placed in a Reserved Panel has a right to be absorbed after the expiry of the panel, and whether the High Court could direct such absorption contrary to the Recruitment Rules.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the direction of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court to absorb the respondent, and held that a candidate in a reserved panel has no right to appointment after the panel expires.

Law Points

  • Reserved Panel
  • Absorption
  • Expiry of Panel
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Limited Right
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (10) 408

Civil Appeal No. of 2025 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) Diary No. 57192 of 2024)

2025-10-15

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA J. , ATUL S. CHANDURKAR J.

2025 INSC 1235, 2025 AIR(SC) 5198, 2026 (1) MhLJ 743, 2026 (2) AllMR(NOC) 8, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2243, 2025 (4) Apex Court Judgments 639, 2025 LIC 4656, 2025 AIR OnLine SC 1005, 2025 AIR(SC)(Civil) 2883, 2025 (4) LLJ 241, 2026 AllSCR 195

Mrs. Banerjee

The Union of India & Ors.

Subit Kumar Das

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court's direction to absorb the respondent as Technician in All India Radio.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought to set aside the High Court's direction to absorb the respondent.

Filing Reason

The appellants were aggrieved by the High Court's direction to absorb the respondent after the expiry of the Reserved Panel, which they contended was contrary to the Recruitment Rules.

Previous Decisions

The Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court directed the appellants to absorb the respondent as Technician in the Eastern Zone of All India Radio under the SC category.

Issues

Whether a candidate placed in a Reserved Panel has a right to be absorbed after the expiry of the panel. Whether the High Court could direct absorption contrary to the Recruitment Rules.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the direction to absorb the respondent enlarged the right of a candidate placed in the Reserved Panel much after its expiry and ran counter to the Recruitment Rules. The respondent contended that the appellants had committed to absorb him as far back as 15.01.1999 and the High Court rightly directed so.

Ratio Decidendi

A candidate placed in a Reserved Panel has no vested right to appointment after the expiry of the panel, and any direction to absorb such a candidate contrary to the Recruitment Rules is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the All India Radio through its Director General are aggrieved by the direction issued by the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court requiring them to absorb the services of the respondent on the post of Technician at the Eastern Zone of All India Radio under the Scheduled Castes (SC) category. According to the appellants, such direction to absorb the services of the respondent enlarges the right of a candidate placed in the Reserved Panel much after its expiry and runs counter to the Recruitment Rules.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a petition before the Calcutta High Court seeking absorption as Technician. The Division Bench directed the appellants to absorb him. The Union of India and All India Radio appealed to the Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petition.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute — Award Under 1940 Act Cannot Be Enforced Under 1996 Act. Contractor's Award for Road Construction Work Held Unenforceable as Arbitration Was Governed by Arbitration Act, 1940 an...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors of Company Not Liable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Sp...