Search Results for "Karnataka Water Supply Board"

144 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes KIADB Order Demanding Excess Lease Premium in Industrial Land Allotment — Refund of Rs. 100 Lakhs Ordered with Interest. KIADB Cannot Charge Premium Exceeding Government-Notified Rate Under Section 3(1) of Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Hadee Forging Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was allotted 2 acres of industrial land by the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Issues Directions for Migrant Labourers in Suo Motu Writ Petition During COVID-19 Pandemic. The Court ordered transportation, food provision, and withdrawal of prosecutions under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to address miseries caused by lockdown and pandemic fears.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu writ petition, addressed the severe hardships faced by migrant labourers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Smart Classrooms — Violation of Natural Justice and Legitimate Expectation. Government Order dated 5.7.2016 quashed as it was passed without hearing the successful bidder and without valid reasons.

The petitioner, M/s Siddharth Infotech Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Governme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that the appellants shared a common object to commit murder.

The appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, in Sessions Case No. 27/1994, convicting the appellants for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly Not Proved and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 324 read with 149 IPC set aside as common object not established beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Biloli, in Sessions Case No. 27/1994, convicting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Ex-Parte Decree for Recovery of Excess Payment in Sub-Contract Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Recover Rs.12,55,965.21 with Interest at 6% p.a. Plaintiff proved that defendant fabricated bills and was paid in excess of work done, leading to decree under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC.

The plaintiff, M/s. Offshore Industrial Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs.12,55,965.21 with interest at 18% p.a. against the def...