Search Results for "defendant hearing"

4837 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4837 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cross Revision Applications by Tenant and Landlord in Mesne Profits Dispute. Court Upholds Small Causes Court's Fixation of Mesne Profits and 9% Interest Rate Under Section 34 CPC.

The judgment involves cross civil revision applications filed by the tenant, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), and the landlord, M/s. Forbe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in License Dispute — Constituted Attorney's Lack of Personal Knowledge Does Not Invalidate Suit When Plaintiff's Ownership is Undisputed and Defendant Fails to Prove Tenancy.

The dispute pertains to Room No.2 (2-A) admeasuring 290 sq.ft on CTS No. 185 situated at 1st Floor, Kumud Villa, 321, Vithalbhai Patel Road, Paper Mil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Declaration Suit — Concurrent Findings of Ownership Based on Will Upheld. Court holds that concurrent findings of fact cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC unless perverse or based on no evidence.

The Regular Second Appeal was filed by the defendant-appellant against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Fact. The Court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC as the findings of the courts below were based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the legal representatives of the original plaintiff...