Search Results for "Banking Companies"

769 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 769 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank of Baroda's Petition to Quash Sales Tax Attachment Over Secured Assets, Holding SARFAESI Act Priority Over State Dues. Secured Creditor's Claim Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides Crown Debt Under MVAT Act, Attachment Without Notice Invalid.

The Bank of Baroda, a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act, had sanctioned credit facilities to M/s. Gajanan India Chemco between September 2009 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — No Ground to Set Aside Sale After Certificate Issued and No Appeal Filed.

The petitioners, Si2 Microsystems Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sanjay Vedaprakash Soni, availed a cash credit facility of Rs. 10 crores and a term loan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Petition Under Article 227 and Section 482 CrPC Against Rejection of Application Under Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments Act — Right to Cross-Examine Complainant's Witnesses Cannot Be Denied

The petitioner, Kishor Biradmal Bhandari, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to establish that the loan of Rs.3,00,000 was legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Arti Rajesh Karangutkar, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Anna Rocky Fernandes, by the Metropolitan Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Case Due to 24-Year Delay in Adjudication. Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 renders it stale and liable to be quashed as abuse of process.

The petitioners, Rachana Garments Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Kumar Bhartiya, challenged a show cause notice dated 27 June 1997 issued by the Co...